This topic contains 152 replies, has 28 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar M-DYMES 13 years, 6 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #22282
    AvatarAvatar
    skate1385
    Participant

    76ers 1. Allen Iverson MVP ROY 11 time all star 4 time scoring champion 2 time all star game MVP

    Raptors 2. Kobe  Bryant 1 time mvp 12 time all star 2 time scoring champion 2 time final mvp 5 time nba champion 3 time all star game mvp

    Grizzlies 3. Ray allne 9 time all star  1 time nba champion  1 time 3 point shootout  chanpion

    Bucks 4.Steve Nash  2 time MVP 7 time all star  2 time skills challenge

    Timberwolvrs 5.Jermanie O’Neal 1time MIP 6 time all star

    Boston 6.Peja  Stojakovic  3 time all star  2 time 3 point shootout chanpion

    LAC 7.Stephon marbury 2 time all star

    Nets 8.Antoine walker 3 time all star

    Dallas 9.Zydrunas Ilguskas 2 time all star

    pacers 10.Marcus  Camby 2 time DPY

    GSW 11.Derek Fisher 5 time nba chanpoion

    This is the top 11 players in the 1996 nba draft

     

    0
  • #411408
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    So this is a draft re-do? In that case I’d have Nash over Allen.

    0
  • #411410
    AvatarAvatar
    gone
    Participant

    Lol Derek Fisher I’d take Ben Wallace maybe???

    0
  • #411412
    AvatarAvatar
    creepingdef
    Participant

    76ers 1. Kobe Bryant

    Raptors 2. Allen Iverson

    Grizzlies 3. Steve Nash

    Bucks 4.Ray Allen

    Timberwolves 5.Jermaine O’Neal

    Boston 6. Stephon Marbury

    LAC 7. Peja Stojakovic

    Nets 8.Antoine Walker

    Dallas 9.Marcus Camby

    Pacers 10.Zydrunas Ilgauskas

    Pacers 11. Derek Fisher

     

    0
  • #411417
    AvatarAvatar
    mwalling2117
    Participant

    Really, Iverson number 1 over Kobe?

    0
  • #411452
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    If you are going by a individual standpoint then you cant go wrong with either Iverson or Kobe at Number One. If you throw in team success then of course you have to go with Kobe but you have to take in account both of their supporting cast. I think individually its a toss up. Iverson pound for pound maybe the greatest player to ever play,definitely one of the greatest if not greatest little guy of all-time. Kobe definitely top ten all-time imo.

    0
  • #411455
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Agree w/ NJHooper, well said.

    0
  • #411485
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    even when both kobe and iverson were in their prime, most people gave kobe the edge. And now the last 5 years and for the forseeable future, its not even close. Also, these arent draft "grades" this is just you redoing the draft.

    0
    • #411509
      AvatarAvatar
      NJHooper95
      Participant

      I understand these are draft grades, but you are incorrect about Kobe being mentioned as the more dominant player in their prime. If that was the case, why did Iverson receive an MVP award in 2001 and Kobe 2008. Kobe is the man, no doubt but individually, aside from titles they were on an even plain. Iverson was unquestionably the leader of his team in Philly, while Kobe has played second fiddle through most of his titles. Lets get it straight!

      0
  • #411503
    AvatarAvatar
    Demarcus Oneal
    Participant

    Are you serious you would pick Iverson over Kobe you must not watch basketball or something

    0
  • #411514
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Who is that question for?

    0
  • #411517
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    lets get what straight? that iverson won 1 mvp award while he had hos own team to do what he wanted and kobe was all first team while sharing the ball with shaq. Not to mention kobe was the far superior defender and played both sides and leads by example with his work ethic while the other guy is known to complain about practice. I was watching their entire careers first hand, most(not all) said kobe was better back from 2000 and on, not just me.

    0
  • #411522
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Iverson killed Kobe everytime they went h2h. If Iverson had Shaq and Kobe had Iverson’s team I think Kobe would have 0 rings whilr Iverson would have 5 or so too.

    0
  • #411524
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    from 2000- to right now, kobe has been on 8 all nba first teams. Iverson has been on 2 first teams in that same span.

    0
  • #411525
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    iverson killed kobe head to head everytime? Do you honestly have stats for that or are you just throwing it out there?

    0
  • #411528
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    and theres no way to tell who would have titles. We could say "add name here" playing with shaq would have x amount of titles for lots of guys when shaq was in his prime. Kobe played d and was much mroe efficient an overall offensive player.

    0
  • #411529
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    just throwing that out there…Iverson did come in the league at around 21 while Kobe came in at 18…factor that in.

    0
  • #411530
    AvatarAvatar
    Demarcus Oneal
    Participant

    Its for skate 1345 honestly anyone who would pick Iverson over Kobe doesnt watch basketball

    0
  • #411532
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    yeah, im not gonna argue iverson was better through the 90’s. He defenitely was. But once kobe hit age 21 in 2000, give me kobe any day over iverson. Theres a reason you dont hear people talking about iverson being compared with jordan. I would be willing to bet anything the sixers take kobe over iverson if they could redo the draft today.

    0
  • #411535
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    yeah, im not gonna argue iverson was better through the 90’s. He defenitely was. But once kobe hit age 21 in 2000, give me kobe any day over iverson. Theres a reason you dont hear people talking about iverson being compared with jordan. I would be willing to bet anything the sixers take kobe over iverson if they could redo the draft today.

    0
  • #411534
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

     Iverson had to carry his teams!

    while kobe rode on the coattails of Shaq and Gasol,

    anybody remember how bad the lakers were when it was Kobe’s team After Shaq and before Gasol?

    0
  • #411537
    AvatarAvatar
    Ahkasi Clay
    Participant

     Iverson had to carry his teams!

    while kobe rode on the coattails of Shaq and Gasol,

    anybody remember how bad the lakers were when it was Kobe’s team After Shaq and before Gasol?

    0
  • #411536
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    jus because you say so? ok.

    0
  • #411539
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    jus because you say so? ok.

    0
  • #411542
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    I would be willing to bet anything the sixers take kobe over iverson if they could redo the draft today.

    ——————————————————————–

    And he wouldn’t win anything. He would not have been a better player than AI was with those teams

    0
  • #411545
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    I would be willing to bet anything the sixers take kobe over iverson if they could redo the draft today.

    ——————————————————————–

    And he wouldn’t win anything. He would not have been a better player than AI was with those teams

    0
  • #411544
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    kobe road shaq’s coattails? Not even close. SHaq was better, but kobe was doing serious work and was the man with the ball in his hands at the end of games. And you also might want to point out that the lakers were in full rebuilding mode for a few years after shaq left. How many deep playoiff runs was iverson making at that time again? And lakers were in first place in the west and on there way to about 55 wins BEFORE pau showed up.

    0
  • #411547
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    kobe road shaq’s coattails? Not even close. SHaq was better, but kobe was doing serious work and was the man with the ball in his hands at the end of games. And you also might want to point out that the lakers were in full rebuilding mode for a few years after shaq left. How many deep playoiff runs was iverson making at that time again? And lakers were in first place in the west and on there way to about 55 wins BEFORE pau showed up.

    0
  • #411548
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    lemmon, and you know that how? And i dont judge who was better strictly off wins. Kobe was better then iverson regardless of wins.

    0
  • #411551
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    lemmon, and you know that how? And i dont judge who was better strictly off wins. Kobe was better then iverson regardless of wins.

    0
  • #411550
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    If kobe had 0 championshups today and Iverson had 5 would you still say that?

    0
  • #411553
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    If kobe had 0 championshups today and Iverson had 5 would you still say that?

    0
  • #411556
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Kobe has player with the most dominant player of our generation, AI played with Eric Snow.

    0
  • #411559
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Kobe has player with the most dominant player of our generation, AI played with Eric Snow.

    0
  • #411568
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    I coulda sworn the Suns were in first that year at that point.

    0
  • #411571
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    I coulda sworn the Suns were in first that year at that point.

    0
  • #411570
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    iverson never won so it doesnt matter who his teammates were. If he won with a crappy team, then i would give him more credit. He couldnt even make a deep playoff run with melo on his team. His one deep playoff run, the east sucked and they got spanked in the finals by the lakers. And again, i dont rank guys just off wins. KObe was better regardless of wins just like karl malone is better then dennis rodman even though rodman got the rings over him.

    0
  • #411573
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    iverson never won so it doesnt matter who his teammates were. If he won with a crappy team, then i would give him more credit. He couldnt even make a deep playoff run with melo on his team. His one deep playoff run, the east sucked and they got spanked in the finals by the lakers. And again, i dont rank guys just off wins. KObe was better regardless of wins just like karl malone is better then dennis rodman even though rodman got the rings over him.

    0
  • #411572
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Perez, Im not saying Iverson is the superior player, Im saying that invidually they were or the same page at one time, not now of course. Like Jammin said if you give Kobe the teams AI played with how many rings would he have now? Would he still be on first team all-nba with those philly teams? Kobe work ethic is one of the best ever, but that just shows you how great a 5/11 165 shooting guard was; who could go for 50 on any nite without practice. How could you underestimate a guy like that? Could you imagine if AI was at least 6/3 Wow? I love Kobe, but hearts dont come much bigger than the one AI possessed. Also when Kobe had his own teams and Not winning he was crying, trying to get Andrew Bynum traded, because he wanted more help!

    0
  • #411576
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Perez, Im not saying Iverson is the superior player, Im saying that invidually they were or the same page at one time, not now of course. Like Jammin said if you give Kobe the teams AI played with how many rings would he have now? Would he still be on first team all-nba with those philly teams? Kobe work ethic is one of the best ever, but that just shows you how great a 5/11 165 shooting guard was; who could go for 50 on any nite without practice. How could you underestimate a guy like that? Could you imagine if AI was at least 6/3 Wow? I love Kobe, but hearts dont come much bigger than the one AI possessed. Also when Kobe had his own teams and Not winning he was crying, trying to get Andrew Bynum traded, because he wanted more help!

    0
  • #411574
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    @yupyup, the lakers were in first at some point in late january. They then lost a handful of games becasue bynum and ariza both went down a few weeks aprat and then i believe the suns and maybe even another team passed them.

    0
  • #411578
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    @yupyup, the lakers were in first at some point in late january. They then lost a handful of games becasue bynum and ariza both went down a few weeks aprat and then i believe the suns and maybe even another team passed them.

    0
  • #411575
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    im not underestimating iverson. I fully respect everything he did. I just said he wasnt better then kobe.

    0
  • #411580
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    im not underestimating iverson. I fully respect everything he did. I just said he wasnt better then kobe.

    0
  • #411577
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    I wouldn’t say the lakers spanked the sixers….

    "He couldnt even make a deep playoff run with melo on his team"

    He was aging, that team was FULL of immature knuckleheads, and that was his first year.

    0
  • #411581
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    I wouldn’t say the lakers spanked the sixers….

    "He couldnt even make a deep playoff run with melo on his team"

    He was aging, that team was FULL of immature knuckleheads, and that was his first year.

    0
  • #411583
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    Thank you for clearing that up.

    0
  • #411588
    AvatarAvatar
    Hale
    Participant

    Thank you for clearing that up.

    0
  • #411585
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    it was 4-1 and the only loss was game 1 in ot after the lakers hadnt played in 10 days. Those games were only as close as they were becasue the lakers played down to the competition becasue they knew they had the finlas in the bag.

    0
  • #411590
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    it was 4-1 and the only loss was game 1 in ot after the lakers hadnt played in 10 days. Those games were only as close as they were becasue the lakers played down to the competition becasue they knew they had the finlas in the bag.

    0
  • #411591
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    they knew they had the finals in the bag after losing game 1 on their home court?IDK

    0
  • #411595
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    they knew they had the finals in the bag after losing game 1 on their home court?IDK

    0
  • #411596
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Anyways, you win….

    But, when is the fantasy draft? What time? thanlks

    0
  • #411599
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Anyways, you win….

    But, when is the fantasy draft? What time? thanlks

    0
  • #411607
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i dont win, its all just opinion. If people feel iverson was better or it was a toss up and kobe only has the edge becasue of rings, then all i can say is i disagree. But what you mean you dont know when the draft is, come on now.

    0
  • #411611
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i dont win, its all just opinion. If people feel iverson was better or it was a toss up and kobe only has the edge becasue of rings, then all i can say is i disagree. But what you mean you dont know when the draft is, come on now.

    0
  • #411612
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Whats good, can i get in on that fantasy draft?

    0
  • #411616
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Whats good, can i get in on that fantasy draft?

    0
  • #411614
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Its the 16, I know, I just don’t wanna argue anymore, so I changed the subject : )

    0
  • #411617
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    Its the 16, I know, I just don’t wanna argue anymore, so I changed the subject : )

    0
  • #411615
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    18th

    0
  • #411619
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    18th

    0
  • #411620
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    ask perez, its his league, its full but i don’t think every1’s active.

    0
  • #411623
    AvatarAvatar
    Michael.S.
    Participant

    ask perez, its his league, its full but i don’t think every1’s active.

    0
  • #411624
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    NJhooper, we’re full. Our draft is this saturday though, if you leave your email and something opens up i can send you an invite.

    0
  • #411627
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    NJhooper, we’re full. Our draft is this saturday though, if you leave your email and something opens up i can send you an invite.

    0
  • #411628
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Perez let me know if someone doesnt participate, be happy to join if thats ok.

    0
  • #411631
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Perez let me know if someone doesnt participate, be happy to join if thats ok.

    0
  • #411630
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Ok Perez thats cool, thanks, I will do that.

    0
  • #411633
    AvatarAvatar
    NJHooper95
    Participant

    Ok Perez thats cool, thanks, I will do that.

    0
  • #411632
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    yeah, i know about 13 or 14 of the 20 are for sure active. I might kick 1 or 2 people out still who havent responded to me.

    0
  • #411635
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    yeah, i know about 13 or 14 of the 20 are for sure active. I might kick 1 or 2 people out still who havent responded to me.

    0
  • #411654
    AvatarAvatar
    CodySLC
    Participant

     Iverson over Kobe? And Allen over Nash?

    0
  • #411657
    AvatarAvatar
    CodySLC
    Participant

     Iverson over Kobe? And Allen over Nash?

    0
  • #411781
    AvatarAvatar
    midwestbbscout
    Participant

    I would probably take Camby ahead of a lot of these guys….big guys that defend as good as Camby for that long are hard to come by…..I’d rather have him than Jermaine O’Neal any day….

    0
  • #411782
    AvatarAvatar
    midwestbbscout
    Participant

    I would probably take Camby ahead of a lot of these guys….big guys that defend as good as Camby for that long are hard to come by…..I’d rather have him than Jermaine O’Neal any day….

    0
  • #411835
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr. 19134
    Participant

    There was a lot of pressure in this city (Philly) for the Sixers to take the local prodigy Kobe first overall.

    But the Sixers thought that the number one pick was too high and the front office at the time thought Allen Iverson was exactly the spark plug that the city needed to bring basketball back to relevance in this city.  And boy were they ever right.  After watching Iverson’s decade in Philly I wouldn’t of traded him for anybody.  And I hated the trade to Denver when it did happen.  Iverson was averaging 33 points a game when we traded him.  With Iverson on the team not only was he the most unique exciting talent to watch I ever saw play basketball.  And even with this slew of super athletic guards coming into the league like Russ, Rose, and Wall I still have never saw anybody compared to the speed Iverson use to have.  

    Iverson like Kobe was stone cold killer.  Always going for the jugular.  He didn’t look at any legends of the game like his idol or even current stars like they were better.  His mentality was he would make them earn his respect before he gave them respect and we love that as our franchise player.

    Kobe would of struggled early in his career playing for the Sixers and would of probably eventually demanded a trade after he didn’t win like he wanted too.  Kobe always wanted to be a Laker and thats why right after the draft Philly made him the black sheep because he was always a Laker at heart thats the only team he wanted to play for.

    Iverson was an instant impact averaging 23 points, and 7.5 assists his rookie year.  Imagine a rookie putting up numbers like that now. He had one of the best rookie years of all time and also one of the best careers.  His only downfall is that he didn’t win a title but Billy King was our GM at the time and he is a terrible talent evaluator.  He game Kenny THomas like a 60 mil deal.  Gave Geiger like 70 mil.  Billy King was terrible.  he drafted Larry Hughes when the whole city was screaming for Paul Pierce and in hindsight Dirk would of been a great pick.

    But the worse part of the A.I. Era was when we came in second in the Duncan lottery.

    We settled for Van Horn at 2nd while the Spurs got Duncan one.

    Imagine if the Sixers would of got Duncan in that draft and what that franchise would of done with A.I. and Duncan.  Iverson would of def got some chips under his belt.

    But if I could do it over

    1. Allen Iverson

    2. Kobe Bryant (it would of been a lot harder for him to develop with the Sixers then the Lakers with Shaq and Eddie Jones)

    3. Steve Nash

    4. Ray Allen

    5. Antoine Walker ( I think people forget how good he was in his prime.  And he did get a chip.)

    0
  • #411842
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr. 19134
    Participant

    There was a lot of pressure in this city (Philly) for the Sixers to take the local prodigy Kobe first overall.

    But the Sixers thought that the number one pick was too high and the front office at the time thought Allen Iverson was exactly the spark plug that the city needed to bring basketball back to relevance in this city.  And boy were they ever right.  After watching Iverson’s decade in Philly I wouldn’t of traded him for anybody.  And I hated the trade to Denver when it did happen.  Iverson was averaging 33 points a game when we traded him.  With Iverson on the team not only was he the most unique exciting talent to watch I ever saw play basketball.  And even with this slew of super athletic guards coming into the league like Russ, Rose, and Wall I still have never saw anybody compared to the speed Iverson use to have.  

    Iverson like Kobe was stone cold killer.  Always going for the jugular.  He didn’t look at any legends of the game like his idol or even current stars like they were better.  His mentality was he would make them earn his respect before he gave them respect and we love that as our franchise player.

    Kobe would of struggled early in his career playing for the Sixers and would of probably eventually demanded a trade after he didn’t win like he wanted too.  Kobe always wanted to be a Laker and thats why right after the draft Philly made him the black sheep because he was always a Laker at heart thats the only team he wanted to play for.

    Iverson was an instant impact averaging 23 points, and 7.5 assists his rookie year.  Imagine a rookie putting up numbers like that now. He had one of the best rookie years of all time and also one of the best careers.  His only downfall is that he didn’t win a title but Billy King was our GM at the time and he is a terrible talent evaluator.  He game Kenny THomas like a 60 mil deal.  Gave Geiger like 70 mil.  Billy King was terrible.  he drafted Larry Hughes when the whole city was screaming for Paul Pierce and in hindsight Dirk would of been a great pick.

    But the worse part of the A.I. Era was when we came in second in the Duncan lottery.

    We settled for Van Horn at 2nd while the Spurs got Duncan one.

    Imagine if the Sixers would of got Duncan in that draft and what that franchise would of done with A.I. and Duncan.  Iverson would of def got some chips under his belt.

    But if I could do it over

    1. Allen Iverson

    2. Kobe Bryant (it would of been a lot harder for him to develop with the Sixers then the Lakers with Shaq and Eddie Jones)

    3. Steve Nash

    4. Ray Allen

    5. Antoine Walker ( I think people forget how good he was in his prime.  And he did get a chip.)

    0
  • #411855
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    there’s no way u can argue wit iverson go’n number 1 if u realistically think about everything he accomplish’d then ticcet sales tv ratings jersey sells nd everything else

    0
  • #411862
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    there’s no way u can argue wit iverson go’n number 1 if u realistically think about everything he accomplish’d then ticcet sales tv ratings jersey sells nd everything else

    0
  • #411859
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    so kobe didnt sell tickets or jerseys?

    0
  • #411866
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    so kobe didnt sell tickets or jerseys?

    0
  • #411861
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    kobe did but iverson was a generation icon

    0
  • #411868
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    kobe did but iverson was a generation icon

    0
  • #411863
    AvatarAvatar
    creepingdef
    Participant

     Kobe has 5 rings, Iverson has 0. Iverson’s not even in the NBA anymore.

    You draft specifically on who will make your team better, and propel you towards a championship. I’ll concede that Iverson is one of the best to ever play, but the guy never won any rings and burned a lot of bridges with teams. 

    And this whole second fiddle thing is bs. Yes Kobe was option number 2 on that team, but majority of the NBA would have been anyway with a Shaq in his prime. 

    0
  • #411870
    AvatarAvatar
    creepingdef
    Participant

     Kobe has 5 rings, Iverson has 0. Iverson’s not even in the NBA anymore.

    You draft specifically on who will make your team better, and propel you towards a championship. I’ll concede that Iverson is one of the best to ever play, but the guy never won any rings and burned a lot of bridges with teams. 

    And this whole second fiddle thing is bs. Yes Kobe was option number 2 on that team, but majority of the NBA would have been anyway with a Shaq in his prime. 

    0
  • #411877
    AvatarAvatar
    mj23mj23bestever
    Participant

    no way is their even an argument about nash would be taken over allen as for ai and kobe couldnt complain either way both are two of the best of all time ai if not the best not far from being the best little guy ever and kobe yea hes had shaq and gasol but hes still that specail player that makes everyone around him better like mj did and something the bnoat lebron will never do

    0
  • #411884
    AvatarAvatar
    mj23mj23bestever
    Participant

    no way is their even an argument about nash would be taken over allen as for ai and kobe couldnt complain either way both are two of the best of all time ai if not the best not far from being the best little guy ever and kobe yea hes had shaq and gasol but hes still that specail player that makes everyone around him better like mj did and something the bnoat lebron will never do

    0
  • #411896
    AvatarAvatar
    dolla130
    Participant

    I think if we could do the draft over iverson still goes #1 and it has nothing to do with stats or wins and losses, When Iverson came into the league he had a Micheal Jordan type impact as in the culture of the game how many little kids looked up to him wanted to be like him, even while the NBA really didnt like what he was about he did it his way, Iverson was the most influential player after jordan and his tickets sales and jersey sales would make kobes laughable now kobe is selling jerseys now but cmon son when iverson was playing superstar ball kobe’s sales couldnt sniff iversons shorts let alone jerseys, and yes kobe is the winner BUT you cant honestly sit here and think philly would have drafted kobe over iverson i think kobe is good where he got drafted just off the fact that if he woulda went 2 he woulda been drafted by toronto and then we wouldnt even be having this debate

    0
  • #411901
    AvatarAvatar
    dolla130
    Participant

    I think if we could do the draft over iverson still goes #1 and it has nothing to do with stats or wins and losses, When Iverson came into the league he had a Micheal Jordan type impact as in the culture of the game how many little kids looked up to him wanted to be like him, even while the NBA really didnt like what he was about he did it his way, Iverson was the most influential player after jordan and his tickets sales and jersey sales would make kobes laughable now kobe is selling jerseys now but cmon son when iverson was playing superstar ball kobe’s sales couldnt sniff iversons shorts let alone jerseys, and yes kobe is the winner BUT you cant honestly sit here and think philly would have drafted kobe over iverson i think kobe is good where he got drafted just off the fact that if he woulda went 2 he woulda been drafted by toronto and then we wouldnt even be having this debate

    0
  • #411898
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    Such as how good they were throughout their career, than this is what it probably would have looked like in the lotto:

    1. Kobe Bryant, Philadelphia 76ers: No contest.

    2. Allen Iverson, Toronto Raptors: He and Damon would have made a small backcourt, but it would have been fun to watch.

    3. Ray Allen, Memphis Grizzlies: Super consistent and would have gone to a Memphis team in need of help at any position. Abdur-Rahim was better at the start of their careers, but Allen finished far ahead due to Shareef’s injuries.

    4. Steve Nash, Milwaukee Bucks: They chose Steph, who they immediately traded for Ray, but Nash’s longevity and overall consistent play warrants him the choice.

    5. Stephon Marbury, Minnesota Timberwolves: First pick that would have brought a player to the actual team they played for in their rookie year, and as much as Stephon finished his career in strange times, he also had flashes of why so many people thought he was such a special player.

    6. Jermaine O’Neal, Boston Celtics: Started his career off slowly, but he would be the best choice of those who were still around due to the value of a good Center.

    7. Shareef Abdur-Rahim, LA Clippers: May not have overwhelmed people with his career achievement, but he was consistently at an All-Star level for a large portion of his career. Stojakovic and Walker are close as far as numbers and such, but Shareef was a beast during his early years in Memphis and on Atlanta.

    8. Antoine Walker, New Jersey Nets: Probably best known for chucking up a ridiculous amount of trey’s, but was a great All-Around player and a constant match-up problem. I honestly thought of putting him higher, but he really never lived up to his vast potential.

    9. Peja Stojakovic, Dallas Mavericks: Had years on Sacramento where he was considered the most dangerous shooter in the game, but since his trade to Indiana, his career has been derailed. He has been around longer than the two forementioned players, but also has played fewer games, and has been injured just as much if not more than both of the above. Had 3 great years, and was a bigger threat at a time than either of them possibly, but I take the other two for the overall contribution.

    10. Marcus Camby, Indiana Pacers: Ilgauskas made All-Star teams, but was injured far more than even Camby, and never had the same contributions as a rebounder or defender. For my money, I take Camby, who has not lived up to expectations yet has been a Center for a number of play-off teams, one of the best shot blockers in the league and has averaged a double double up to this point in his career.

    11. Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Indiana Pacers: Definitely a gigantic step over Todd Fuller, the original draftee, a Center from North Carolina State who is basically known as the Warriors Sam Bowie to the pick of Kobe Bryant only 2 spots later. Z could have been much higher on the list, but again it is injuries that have brought him to 11. Seems to be a common theme for this draft class, which was very deep but also has a number of unfortunately shortened careers.

    12. Derek Fisher, Cleveland Cavaliers: He won 5 chips, and while his role was quite big, you have to give a lot of the credit to some of the more formidable players on those teams. Has always been solid, a nice shooter, knows his role and a great leader. Would he have won championships on Cleveland? More than likely, no, but he would be around for longer than anyone left and would have been a step up over any player left.

    13. Kerry Kittles, Charlotte Hornets: The infamous Kobe spot goes to the man who inspired the way I wear my socks (one high, one low). His career lasted a little more than 6 seasons, but he posted pretty impressive career averages, surely worthy of being picked somewhere near the lottery. Some may wish to take someone who played longer, but Kittles spanned the average NBA career and played pretty well doing so. I take him to finish off the 1996 lottery re-do.

    0
  • #411903
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    Such as how good they were throughout their career, than this is what it probably would have looked like in the lotto:

    1. Kobe Bryant, Philadelphia 76ers: No contest.

    2. Allen Iverson, Toronto Raptors: He and Damon would have made a small backcourt, but it would have been fun to watch.

    3. Ray Allen, Memphis Grizzlies: Super consistent and would have gone to a Memphis team in need of help at any position. Abdur-Rahim was better at the start of their careers, but Allen finished far ahead due to Shareef’s injuries.

    4. Steve Nash, Milwaukee Bucks: They chose Steph, who they immediately traded for Ray, but Nash’s longevity and overall consistent play warrants him the choice.

    5. Stephon Marbury, Minnesota Timberwolves: First pick that would have brought a player to the actual team they played for in their rookie year, and as much as Stephon finished his career in strange times, he also had flashes of why so many people thought he was such a special player.

    6. Jermaine O’Neal, Boston Celtics: Started his career off slowly, but he would be the best choice of those who were still around due to the value of a good Center.

    7. Shareef Abdur-Rahim, LA Clippers: May not have overwhelmed people with his career achievement, but he was consistently at an All-Star level for a large portion of his career. Stojakovic and Walker are close as far as numbers and such, but Shareef was a beast during his early years in Memphis and on Atlanta.

    8. Antoine Walker, New Jersey Nets: Probably best known for chucking up a ridiculous amount of trey’s, but was a great All-Around player and a constant match-up problem. I honestly thought of putting him higher, but he really never lived up to his vast potential.

    9. Peja Stojakovic, Dallas Mavericks: Had years on Sacramento where he was considered the most dangerous shooter in the game, but since his trade to Indiana, his career has been derailed. He has been around longer than the two forementioned players, but also has played fewer games, and has been injured just as much if not more than both of the above. Had 3 great years, and was a bigger threat at a time than either of them possibly, but I take the other two for the overall contribution.

    10. Marcus Camby, Indiana Pacers: Ilgauskas made All-Star teams, but was injured far more than even Camby, and never had the same contributions as a rebounder or defender. For my money, I take Camby, who has not lived up to expectations yet has been a Center for a number of play-off teams, one of the best shot blockers in the league and has averaged a double double up to this point in his career.

    11. Zydrunas Ilgauskas, Indiana Pacers: Definitely a gigantic step over Todd Fuller, the original draftee, a Center from North Carolina State who is basically known as the Warriors Sam Bowie to the pick of Kobe Bryant only 2 spots later. Z could have been much higher on the list, but again it is injuries that have brought him to 11. Seems to be a common theme for this draft class, which was very deep but also has a number of unfortunately shortened careers.

    12. Derek Fisher, Cleveland Cavaliers: He won 5 chips, and while his role was quite big, you have to give a lot of the credit to some of the more formidable players on those teams. Has always been solid, a nice shooter, knows his role and a great leader. Would he have won championships on Cleveland? More than likely, no, but he would be around for longer than anyone left and would have been a step up over any player left.

    13. Kerry Kittles, Charlotte Hornets: The infamous Kobe spot goes to the man who inspired the way I wear my socks (one high, one low). His career lasted a little more than 6 seasons, but he posted pretty impressive career averages, surely worthy of being picked somewhere near the lottery. Some may wish to take someone who played longer, but Kittles spanned the average NBA career and played pretty well doing so. I take him to finish off the 1996 lottery re-do.

    0
  • #411907
    AvatarAvatar
    billyk
    Participant

    Allen Iverson brought that street/Hip Hop swag to the NBA.. The tattoos, talk, cornrolls, attitude, and "street game." AI crossover changed the rules of the game… Personally AI changed the culture of the league, it seemed like he came right off the playground right into a NBA arena… I would have also taken AI with the 1st pick he was an unreal entertainer and was one of the most intense competitiors ever… 

    0
  • #411902
    AvatarAvatar
    billyk
    Participant

    Allen Iverson brought that street/Hip Hop swag to the NBA.. The tattoos, talk, cornrolls, attitude, and "street game." AI crossover changed the rules of the game… Personally AI changed the culture of the league, it seemed like he came right off the playground right into a NBA arena… I would have also taken AI with the 1st pick he was an unreal entertainer and was one of the most intense competitiors ever… 

    0
  • #411910
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    okay, lets look at stats, accomplishments and facts between the two:

    points: iverson, 24,368 (26.7ppg)……kobe, 25,790 (25.3ppg)

    fg%: iverson, 43%……..kobe, 46%

    assists: iverson, 6.2apg……….kobe, 4.7apg

    rebounds: iverson, 3.7 rpg……….kobe, 5.3rpg

    all nba 1st teams: iverson, 3………..kobe, 8

    and since so many think he was such a better scorer then kobe:

    games over 50: iverson 11 (high of 60)………kobe, 24 (high of 81)

    and please lets not even begin to discuss defense on this one. Add in the fact iversons nba career is probably a wrap while kobe is still going strong. Add in that kobe helped lead usa to gold while ai led usa to bronze. And then theres the whole championships thing. If you guys would take iverson number 1 over kobe, whoever picked second would be absolutely thrilled to have gotten the better player.

    0
  • #411915
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    okay, lets look at stats, accomplishments and facts between the two:

    points: iverson, 24,368 (26.7ppg)……kobe, 25,790 (25.3ppg)

    fg%: iverson, 43%……..kobe, 46%

    assists: iverson, 6.2apg……….kobe, 4.7apg

    rebounds: iverson, 3.7 rpg……….kobe, 5.3rpg

    all nba 1st teams: iverson, 3………..kobe, 8

    and since so many think he was such a better scorer then kobe:

    games over 50: iverson 11 (high of 60)………kobe, 24 (high of 81)

    and please lets not even begin to discuss defense on this one. Add in the fact iversons nba career is probably a wrap while kobe is still going strong. Add in that kobe helped lead usa to gold while ai led usa to bronze. And then theres the whole championships thing. If you guys would take iverson number 1 over kobe, whoever picked second would be absolutely thrilled to have gotten the better player.

    0
  • #411914
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    mikeyvet, i think ben wallace has to be on there somewhere.

    0
  • #411919
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    mikeyvet, i think ben wallace has to be on there somewhere.

    0
  • #411957
    AvatarAvatar
    billyk
    Participant

    Sometimes its NOT about the numbers…

     

    0
  • #411960
    AvatarAvatar
    billyk
    Participant

    Sometimes its NOT about the numbers…

     

    0
  • #411963
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    your right, so is your argument about leadership? Work ethic? Marketability? Cause so far the only thing i have read that supports iverson going first is that he was a revolutionary for being one of the first street players and many young fans gravitated towards him for that and it sold jerseys and shoes. Is that really worth taking him over kobe?

    0
  • #411966
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    your right, so is your argument about leadership? Work ethic? Marketability? Cause so far the only thing i have read that supports iverson going first is that he was a revolutionary for being one of the first street players and many young fans gravitated towards him for that and it sold jerseys and shoes. Is that really worth taking him over kobe?

    0
  • #412007
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    I guess it’s unpopular to pick Kobe in this thread, but it’s not that close between he and Iverson in my opinion.

    Iverson was a phenomenal talent, had the heart of a lion and left it on the floor every night, BUT… He didn’t have the complete game that Kobe has. He didn’t have the size that Kobe has. Other than playing the passing lanes, Iverson was a defensive liability. Kobe on the other hand was the premier perimeter defender in the league. Kobe was a superstar player at both ends of the floor, while Iverson never was even considered to make an All-NBA Defensive Team.

    I thought Iverson was coo too when he had braids, crossed over Jordan, crossed Lue and stepped over him, use to do the dunk where he held it with one hand and dunked/hung on the rim with two… I had like every pair of the Answers lol… BUT… Kobe is the second best shooting guard ever… And his career is still going strong.

     

    0
  • #412010
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    I guess it’s unpopular to pick Kobe in this thread, but it’s not that close between he and Iverson in my opinion.

    Iverson was a phenomenal talent, had the heart of a lion and left it on the floor every night, BUT… He didn’t have the complete game that Kobe has. He didn’t have the size that Kobe has. Other than playing the passing lanes, Iverson was a defensive liability. Kobe on the other hand was the premier perimeter defender in the league. Kobe was a superstar player at both ends of the floor, while Iverson never was even considered to make an All-NBA Defensive Team.

    I thought Iverson was coo too when he had braids, crossed over Jordan, crossed Lue and stepped over him, use to do the dunk where he held it with one hand and dunked/hung on the rim with two… I had like every pair of the Answers lol… BUT… Kobe is the second best shooting guard ever… And his career is still going strong.

     

    0
  • #412013
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    I was going to say of players drafted man, but Ben Wallace would more than likely be somewhere next to Marcus Camby. I was trying to factor out as much as possible as to who they were playing with and such, because while Ben was the heart of that Pistons team, he basically had an All-Star at each position. One year 4 of them made the ASG, and to me, while Tayshaun has yet to make an All-Star team, his length and versatility always made him an integral part of the Pistons being such a strong team. But, Ben Wallace was a great player for a number of years, and he would be right in the running along with Marcus Camby, Peja Stojakovic and possibly even Antoine Walker. I do not think he was ever the shut down defender people credit him to be, but nonetheless his rebounding and shot blocking statistics over his years as a Piston were pretty awesome. Where would you rank Ben amongst these players? I would probably have to put him at 11. I am reluctant to do so, as he was at a time far above Camby when it came to the games Centers, and made numerous All-Star teams, won even more defensive accolades, but his lack of an offensive game is what it would come down too. Plus, his career basically shut down once he left Detroit, he had limited effectiveness in Chicago, and even backed-up Ilgauskas in Cleveland. Maybe it is my recent memory of Dwight Howard whupping him in the 2009 ECF that has made me put Ben this low, but you are right, he would be somewhere in that lottery list.

    0
  • #412016
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    I was going to say of players drafted man, but Ben Wallace would more than likely be somewhere next to Marcus Camby. I was trying to factor out as much as possible as to who they were playing with and such, because while Ben was the heart of that Pistons team, he basically had an All-Star at each position. One year 4 of them made the ASG, and to me, while Tayshaun has yet to make an All-Star team, his length and versatility always made him an integral part of the Pistons being such a strong team. But, Ben Wallace was a great player for a number of years, and he would be right in the running along with Marcus Camby, Peja Stojakovic and possibly even Antoine Walker. I do not think he was ever the shut down defender people credit him to be, but nonetheless his rebounding and shot blocking statistics over his years as a Piston were pretty awesome. Where would you rank Ben amongst these players? I would probably have to put him at 11. I am reluctant to do so, as he was at a time far above Camby when it came to the games Centers, and made numerous All-Star teams, won even more defensive accolades, but his lack of an offensive game is what it would come down too. Plus, his career basically shut down once he left Detroit, he had limited effectiveness in Chicago, and even backed-up Ilgauskas in Cleveland. Maybe it is my recent memory of Dwight Howard whupping him in the 2009 ECF that has made me put Ben this low, but you are right, he would be somewhere in that lottery list.

    0
  • #412040
    AvatarAvatar
    Narc
    Participant

    To me its close between Iverson and Kobe, real close. First off I think that it needs to be re stated, that Kobe while in his prime, had the most dominant force of this generation on his side at the time, Shaquille O’Neal. No matter how many stats you guys put up, how many All Star teams each guy made, Kobe had Shaq…nuff said. I don’t think Kobe would have won any championships with that Laker team, if Vlade Divac was still the Center over there (had he not been involved with the deal and certainly no disrespect to Vlade). It needs to be pointed out that you really can’t lose either way. Each man brings a lot to the table. Iverson was a scorer in a PG’s body, he also could distribute the ball well for a guy who had that shoot first mental make up. Kobe was probably the most versatile scorer coming out of that draft (said in retrospect of course), he’s really matured past the Shaq years (which is why when people compared their leadership qualities, I balked at it because I don’t think people really remember the arrogant little shit Kobe was when Shaq was there.) and has in fact become a role model for kids everwhere.

     

    In terms of basketball, you really couldn’t lose, but I do think that it needs to be said that given the supporting casts, its easy to say that Kobe is the more logical choice now. I think if you put AI on that Laker squad, they would have won just as many championships. It needs to be remembered that when the 76ers and the Lakers did meet in the finals that year, The 76ers were the only team that did not get swept by the LA Lakers.

    0
  • #412041
    AvatarAvatar
    Narc
    Participant

    To me its close between Iverson and Kobe, real close. First off I think that it needs to be re stated, that Kobe while in his prime, had the most dominant force of this generation on his side at the time, Shaquille O’Neal. No matter how many stats you guys put up, how many All Star teams each guy made, Kobe had Shaq…nuff said. I don’t think Kobe would have won any championships with that Laker team, if Vlade Divac was still the Center over there (had he not been involved with the deal and certainly no disrespect to Vlade). It needs to be pointed out that you really can’t lose either way. Each man brings a lot to the table. Iverson was a scorer in a PG’s body, he also could distribute the ball well for a guy who had that shoot first mental make up. Kobe was probably the most versatile scorer coming out of that draft (said in retrospect of course), he’s really matured past the Shaq years (which is why when people compared their leadership qualities, I balked at it because I don’t think people really remember the arrogant little shit Kobe was when Shaq was there.) and has in fact become a role model for kids everwhere.

     

    In terms of basketball, you really couldn’t lose, but I do think that it needs to be said that given the supporting casts, its easy to say that Kobe is the more logical choice now. I think if you put AI on that Laker squad, they would have won just as many championships. It needs to be remembered that when the 76ers and the Lakers did meet in the finals that year, The 76ers were the only team that did not get swept by the LA Lakers.

    0
  • #412058
    AvatarAvatar
    Narc
    Participant

    To me its close between Iverson and Kobe, real close. First off I think that it needs to be re stated, that Kobe while in his prime, had the most dominant force of this generation on his side at the time, Shaquille O’Neal. No matter how many stats you guys put up, how many All Star teams each guy made, Kobe had Shaq…nuff said. I don’t think Kobe would have won any championships with that Laker team, if Vlade Divac was still the Center over there (had he not been involved with the deal and certainly no disrespect to Vlade). It needs to be pointed out that you really can’t lose either way. Each man brings a lot to the table. Iverson was a scorer in a PG’s body, he also could distribute the ball well for a guy who had that shoot first mental make up. Kobe was probably the most versatile scorer coming out of that draft (said in retrospect of course), he’s really matured past the Shaq years (which is why when people compared their leadership qualities, I balked at it because I don’t think people really remember the arrogant little shit Kobe was when Shaq was there.) and has in fact become a role model for kids everwhere.

     

    In terms of basketball, you really couldn’t lose, but I do think that it needs to be said that given the supporting casts, its easy to say that Kobe is the more logical choice now. I think if you put AI on that Laker squad, they would have won just as many championships. It needs to be remembered that when the 76ers and the Lakers did meet in the finals that year, The 76ers were the only team that did not get swept by the LA Lakers.

    0
  • #412061
    AvatarAvatar
    Pureshooter
    Participant

    I think Iverson and Kobe are both fantastic.  Iverson is probably the quickest player in NBA history with the ball, while Kobe is one of the best all-around players of all time.  Statistically through their careers they have been pretty close, but obviously Kobe has had far superior teams to help win titles.  I would personally go with Kobe, but you can’t go wrong with either one. 

    I would definitely take Nash third, Allen fourth, and maybe Peja fifth over O’Neal. I know O’Neal put together some pretty good seasons, but he was a slow starter and isn’t much of an interior presence any longer.  I guess it really depends on team need between the two.

    0
  • #412080
    AvatarAvatar
    Pureshooter
    Participant

    I think Iverson and Kobe are both fantastic.  Iverson is probably the quickest player in NBA history with the ball, while Kobe is one of the best all-around players of all time.  Statistically through their careers they have been pretty close, but obviously Kobe has had far superior teams to help win titles.  I would personally go with Kobe, but you can’t go wrong with either one. 

    I would definitely take Nash third, Allen fourth, and maybe Peja fifth over O’Neal. I know O’Neal put together some pretty good seasons, but he was a slow starter and isn’t much of an interior presence any longer.  I guess it really depends on team need between the two.

    0
  • #412113
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     Iverson was more of a generational icon, yet Kobe is still on commercials, winning NBA championships, scoring 27 ppg in 2010, and Iverson is playing in Turkey??  They were drafted the same year, they are the same generation, Iverson had a good run, but Kobe is WAYY more of a generational icon than Iverson.  You can tell an icon by non fans knowing who they are.  I bet if you stopped 10 non basketball fans on the street more would know who Kobe Bryant is than Allen Iverson.

    0
  • #412131
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     Iverson was more of a generational icon, yet Kobe is still on commercials, winning NBA championships, scoring 27 ppg in 2010, and Iverson is playing in Turkey??  They were drafted the same year, they are the same generation, Iverson had a good run, but Kobe is WAYY more of a generational icon than Iverson.  You can tell an icon by non fans knowing who they are.  I bet if you stopped 10 non basketball fans on the street more would know who Kobe Bryant is than Allen Iverson.

    0
  • #412197
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    I think it would be extremely hard 2 find anybody tht doesn’t know who allen iverson is

    0
  • #412215
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    I think it would be extremely hard 2 find anybody tht doesn’t know who allen iverson is

    0
  • #412207
    AvatarAvatar
    Pureshooter
    Participant

    I guarantee you most, if not all of the women in my family have no idea who Allen Iverson is.  They’ve never watched a Sportscenter or an NBA game in their lives.  I think most men would know who he is, but most women and children under the age of 10 probably wouldn’t.  His name and face aren’t pasted all over the TV like Kobe’s.

    0
  • #412225
    AvatarAvatar
    Pureshooter
    Participant

    I guarantee you most, if not all of the women in my family have no idea who Allen Iverson is.  They’ve never watched a Sportscenter or an NBA game in their lives.  I think most men would know who he is, but most women and children under the age of 10 probably wouldn’t.  His name and face aren’t pasted all over the TV like Kobe’s.

    0
  • #412228
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    I dnt know where u live but all tha kids under 10 nd every woman knows who allen iverson is n my neighborhood granted it is compton nd just about nobody likes kobe but love tha lakers everybody knows who he is too

    0
  • #412245
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    I dnt know where u live but all tha kids under 10 nd every woman knows who allen iverson is n my neighborhood granted it is compton nd just about nobody likes kobe but love tha lakers everybody knows who he is too

    0
  • #412244
    AvatarAvatar
    bkb77
    Participant

    Its funny I saw an interview with Billy King than sixers gm at the time about 4 or 5 years ago talking about the draft saying that A.I was the right pick but that he had a trade in place with the honets to get the 13th pick & Kobe but they wanted jerry stackhouse who at that time he would not part with, could you imagine if the sixers got A.I & the hometown kid Kobe,idk if there would be enough balls to go around but it would have been fun to watch.

    0
  • #412261
    AvatarAvatar
    bkb77
    Participant

    Its funny I saw an interview with Billy King than sixers gm at the time about 4 or 5 years ago talking about the draft saying that A.I was the right pick but that he had a trade in place with the honets to get the 13th pick & Kobe but they wanted jerry stackhouse who at that time he would not part with, could you imagine if the sixers got A.I & the hometown kid Kobe,idk if there would be enough balls to go around but it would have been fun to watch.

    0
  • #412252
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    Of course this is a hypothetical topic, and there was a very limited research base on HS players entering the NBA, but if you look at the two players in general, you have to go with Kobe. Being the best pound for pound player, which many people claim Allen Iverson is, would only be a great title if AI had won a championship. Yes, he never had Shaquille O’Neal, but I even feel Kobe reached his prime after Shaq had left, maybe even the last year or so the two played together. Kobe Bryant has so much better of an All-Around game than Iverson it is indeed ridiculous. Yes, AI was an extremely popular player, ridiculously quick, fun to watch and only 6 foot if that, compared to Kobe being prototypical wing height (6’6-6’7). But, honestly, what Kobe has done since Shaq has left is the reason why he truly has seperated himself from Iverson. But, even before than, Kobe has been a better player than Allen Iverson probably since he was around 22-23, and that takes into account that AI won an MVP. Call Kobe selfish, but who took more ridiculous shots than Allen Iverson? If Kobe were drafted by his hometown 76ers, believe me, they would not have booed him at the ASG when he won MVP. They would have embraced Kobe as much as they would have embraced AI. I think part of the reason people hated Kobe was due to his perceived arrogance, such as demanding a trade upon being drafted and playing for a Lakers team that had just signed the most dominant force in basketball. But, even today, I will admit that over their respective careers, Kobe Bryant surpasses Shaquille O’Neal, who just crushes Allen Iverson.

    If you say the numbers mean nothing, that is your perogative, but I think they are maybe the only case Iverson could possibly have against Kobe, in his points and assists, maybe even steals per game. But, Kobe was a much better shooter, from the field and the line, was a far superior individual defender and as much as AI could get off his shot with amazing regularity, he has nowhere near the ability of Kobe when it comes to clutch shooting. AI had an amazing game against the Lakers in his only finals appearance, and seemed to carry a team on his shoulders, but to me he was also an incredibly selfish player who was just as if not more arrogant than Kobe. It had to be Allen’s way or else. He went through second option after second option, never finding the right fit, and upon being traded did little to change his attitude. Even if you throw out his time with the Pistons/Grizz/return to the 76ers, he was really a rebel without a cause. People say the NBA picked on him, but if anything that just made him more recognizable and a bigger presence with more sympathizers. Allen Iverson proved throughout his time in the NBA that he cared more about AI than he did about winning, and as much as Kobe may be an egomaniac, he has shown time and time again that winning is extremely important to him. Kobe has made concessions, but overall, he has always done what is necessary to win. If Allen Iverson were to do the same thing, he would still be in the NBA.

    When Allen Iverson played for Georgetown, he quickly became my favorite player. I was really happy when he went first in the draft, and for the longest time, he was my favorite player in the league. I constantly took his side and loved to see him cross people up and score big. He was the rebellious leader of the NBA’s hip-hop generation, and the first time I had ever seen a player wear cornrows was when he donned them in the rookie game. Soon, it became the trend, almost the same as people getting rid of them once he decided they were not his thing anymore while on the Pistons. My ultimate hope was that he would get better teammates and would be able to challenge for championships, and while I still liked the Lakers more than his 76ers, I definitely liked Iverson more than Kobe. That is, until 2002, when I was staying at a hotel in Seattle. Little did I know that the 76ers were in town to play the Super Sonics. While I had honestly no idea they would be there, I had on that day an Allen Iverson baseball cap and an Allen Iverson football jersey I had just bought at Foot Locker (Reebok made them of course). As soon as we checked in, we saw their team bus and decided to wait a few minutes to see if players walked out. The first player we saw was Allen Iverson. He walked through the lobby, oblivious to the world and totally ignored the maybe, 5 people there. Not to mention, he was the first person on the bus by 20 minutes (I guess he was at least punctual than). He had all in all, pretended to talk on his cell phone, but even if he really was, he hung it up the moment he stepped on the bus. Same drill the next day, except there were more people and he was last person on the bus. Now, I am not a big fan of bothering athletes for their autographs, and I do understand that they are human beings, who have good days and bad days. I also get that it is not their obligation to sign them, I only think it is nice when they do so. But, lets just say, we got a bunch of other players signatures, and Allen Iverson clearly could not give a care in the world about us. It was kind of revelatory, and from that moment, I kind of stopped caring about him. I still thought he was a great player, but he was no longer even close to my favorite. I was no longer a fan of his teams and I came to believe more and more the bad things people might have been saying about him.

    The final thing in looking at these two players is what they both did with what they were given. Allen Iverson was an anomaly, he was a 6 foot shooting guard who was at times indefensable with his speed. He posted incredible scoring numbers and carried a franchise for years, posting scoring numbers up there with the all-time greats (For a long time only Jordan and Wilt were higher in PPG). But, with all of the talent he was given, I believe he had nowhere near the work ethic of Kobe Bryant. Kobe Bryant lived and breathed the game of basketball, and I think as much as people may have disliked him as a person, this rubbed off on his teammates a great deal. Kobe lead by example and by showing an amazing work ethic, which is pretty much as close to Michael Jordan as you can get. Allen Iverson goes beyond his now famous "PRACTICE" rant. Granted, that rant makes him look like a total moron, but the rumors of his dogging practice, spending it in the bathroom or eating breakfast burritos instead of working out, they could only be rumors, but you never heard, "Well AI is working his butt off this off-season to add something new to his game". So, like Iverson more than Kobe, that is fine, you can say you would have rather had Iverson for more of a duration of his career (like, maybe liking him for the first 8 years over Kobe, though I do not get past maybe 4-5), say that Allen Iverson is more marketable and sold more jerseys (at a time of course, though Nike sure makes a lot of Kobe stuff now, and even with my extensive AI collection, my Kobe stuff far surpasses it, but I digress) but do not say that it is a close call between these two players. Knowing everything we know now, Kobe Bryant is 100% the first pick in the 1996 draft, and it is not even close. If the 76ers did indeed draft Allen Iverson, saying that the two GM’s travelled back in time and knew what they had seen before the 1996 draft, than the Raptors would be an eternally thankful team picking Kobe Bryant. If the 76ers did indeed pick Kobe, that Raptors, as I said in my breakdown, would be fun. I am pretty sure people can see the difference in this reaction and know the difference between these two players.

    0
  • #412269
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    Of course this is a hypothetical topic, and there was a very limited research base on HS players entering the NBA, but if you look at the two players in general, you have to go with Kobe. Being the best pound for pound player, which many people claim Allen Iverson is, would only be a great title if AI had won a championship. Yes, he never had Shaquille O’Neal, but I even feel Kobe reached his prime after Shaq had left, maybe even the last year or so the two played together. Kobe Bryant has so much better of an All-Around game than Iverson it is indeed ridiculous. Yes, AI was an extremely popular player, ridiculously quick, fun to watch and only 6 foot if that, compared to Kobe being prototypical wing height (6’6-6’7). But, honestly, what Kobe has done since Shaq has left is the reason why he truly has seperated himself from Iverson. But, even before than, Kobe has been a better player than Allen Iverson probably since he was around 22-23, and that takes into account that AI won an MVP. Call Kobe selfish, but who took more ridiculous shots than Allen Iverson? If Kobe were drafted by his hometown 76ers, believe me, they would not have booed him at the ASG when he won MVP. They would have embraced Kobe as much as they would have embraced AI. I think part of the reason people hated Kobe was due to his perceived arrogance, such as demanding a trade upon being drafted and playing for a Lakers team that had just signed the most dominant force in basketball. But, even today, I will admit that over their respective careers, Kobe Bryant surpasses Shaquille O’Neal, who just crushes Allen Iverson.

    If you say the numbers mean nothing, that is your perogative, but I think they are maybe the only case Iverson could possibly have against Kobe, in his points and assists, maybe even steals per game. But, Kobe was a much better shooter, from the field and the line, was a far superior individual defender and as much as AI could get off his shot with amazing regularity, he has nowhere near the ability of Kobe when it comes to clutch shooting. AI had an amazing game against the Lakers in his only finals appearance, and seemed to carry a team on his shoulders, but to me he was also an incredibly selfish player who was just as if not more arrogant than Kobe. It had to be Allen’s way or else. He went through second option after second option, never finding the right fit, and upon being traded did little to change his attitude. Even if you throw out his time with the Pistons/Grizz/return to the 76ers, he was really a rebel without a cause. People say the NBA picked on him, but if anything that just made him more recognizable and a bigger presence with more sympathizers. Allen Iverson proved throughout his time in the NBA that he cared more about AI than he did about winning, and as much as Kobe may be an egomaniac, he has shown time and time again that winning is extremely important to him. Kobe has made concessions, but overall, he has always done what is necessary to win. If Allen Iverson were to do the same thing, he would still be in the NBA.

    When Allen Iverson played for Georgetown, he quickly became my favorite player. I was really happy when he went first in the draft, and for the longest time, he was my favorite player in the league. I constantly took his side and loved to see him cross people up and score big. He was the rebellious leader of the NBA’s hip-hop generation, and the first time I had ever seen a player wear cornrows was when he donned them in the rookie game. Soon, it became the trend, almost the same as people getting rid of them once he decided they were not his thing anymore while on the Pistons. My ultimate hope was that he would get better teammates and would be able to challenge for championships, and while I still liked the Lakers more than his 76ers, I definitely liked Iverson more than Kobe. That is, until 2002, when I was staying at a hotel in Seattle. Little did I know that the 76ers were in town to play the Super Sonics. While I had honestly no idea they would be there, I had on that day an Allen Iverson baseball cap and an Allen Iverson football jersey I had just bought at Foot Locker (Reebok made them of course). As soon as we checked in, we saw their team bus and decided to wait a few minutes to see if players walked out. The first player we saw was Allen Iverson. He walked through the lobby, oblivious to the world and totally ignored the maybe, 5 people there. Not to mention, he was the first person on the bus by 20 minutes (I guess he was at least punctual than). He had all in all, pretended to talk on his cell phone, but even if he really was, he hung it up the moment he stepped on the bus. Same drill the next day, except there were more people and he was last person on the bus. Now, I am not a big fan of bothering athletes for their autographs, and I do understand that they are human beings, who have good days and bad days. I also get that it is not their obligation to sign them, I only think it is nice when they do so. But, lets just say, we got a bunch of other players signatures, and Allen Iverson clearly could not give a care in the world about us. It was kind of revelatory, and from that moment, I kind of stopped caring about him. I still thought he was a great player, but he was no longer even close to my favorite. I was no longer a fan of his teams and I came to believe more and more the bad things people might have been saying about him.

    The final thing in looking at these two players is what they both did with what they were given. Allen Iverson was an anomaly, he was a 6 foot shooting guard who was at times indefensable with his speed. He posted incredible scoring numbers and carried a franchise for years, posting scoring numbers up there with the all-time greats (For a long time only Jordan and Wilt were higher in PPG). But, with all of the talent he was given, I believe he had nowhere near the work ethic of Kobe Bryant. Kobe Bryant lived and breathed the game of basketball, and I think as much as people may have disliked him as a person, this rubbed off on his teammates a great deal. Kobe lead by example and by showing an amazing work ethic, which is pretty much as close to Michael Jordan as you can get. Allen Iverson goes beyond his now famous "PRACTICE" rant. Granted, that rant makes him look like a total moron, but the rumors of his dogging practice, spending it in the bathroom or eating breakfast burritos instead of working out, they could only be rumors, but you never heard, "Well AI is working his butt off this off-season to add something new to his game". So, like Iverson more than Kobe, that is fine, you can say you would have rather had Iverson for more of a duration of his career (like, maybe liking him for the first 8 years over Kobe, though I do not get past maybe 4-5), say that Allen Iverson is more marketable and sold more jerseys (at a time of course, though Nike sure makes a lot of Kobe stuff now, and even with my extensive AI collection, my Kobe stuff far surpasses it, but I digress) but do not say that it is a close call between these two players. Knowing everything we know now, Kobe Bryant is 100% the first pick in the 1996 draft, and it is not even close. If the 76ers did indeed draft Allen Iverson, saying that the two GM’s travelled back in time and knew what they had seen before the 1996 draft, than the Raptors would be an eternally thankful team picking Kobe Bryant. If the 76ers did indeed pick Kobe, that Raptors, as I said in my breakdown, would be fun. I am pretty sure people can see the difference in this reaction and know the difference between these two players.

    0
  • #412284
    AvatarAvatar
    oden07
    Participant

     it is true that kobe has had a better career, but AI might be the greatest scorer of this generation, and he did age alot faster than kobe has and it probably has some to do with how small iverson is and he plays harder than anyone else on the floor and he was a good team player he just didnt have enough left in the tank when he got to finals (it is kinda like lebron against the spurs he singlehandedly got them to the finals but it just seemed like they ran out of gas and didnt have enough left to finish) and if you put most people with shaq in his prime u would win championships no doubt. But I just dont think kobe can do it by himself like AI. When Kobe got his own team, they played awful and they were nothing until gasol got there. 

    0
  • #412301
    AvatarAvatar
    oden07
    Participant

     it is true that kobe has had a better career, but AI might be the greatest scorer of this generation, and he did age alot faster than kobe has and it probably has some to do with how small iverson is and he plays harder than anyone else on the floor and he was a good team player he just didnt have enough left in the tank when he got to finals (it is kinda like lebron against the spurs he singlehandedly got them to the finals but it just seemed like they ran out of gas and didnt have enough left to finish) and if you put most people with shaq in his prime u would win championships no doubt. But I just dont think kobe can do it by himself like AI. When Kobe got his own team, they played awful and they were nothing until gasol got there. 

    0
  • #412390
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    wht did kobe do tha 2years after shaq left nd before pau got there? he didn’t seem to carry those teams very far

    0
  • #412406
    AvatarAvatar
    yadskii
    Participant

    wht did kobe do tha 2years after shaq left nd before pau got there? he didn’t seem to carry those teams very far

    0
  • #412468
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    I’d still take Kobe first. Based on how Iverson’s career went down the drain like how it has in the past couple of years, it is hard not to go with Kobe. In comparison to what Kobe had to do alone, Iverson’s competition was pretty weak in the eastern conference when he made that run. Kobe had to compete with the Spurs, Mavericks, and Suns with pretty good player(emphasize the S) who were at the peak of their careers. Those teams were complete teams back when Kobe was alone in LA. It is just hard not to go with the guy with the more complete career and more complete player. A.I.’s mentality is just the fact that he is a selfish player, and not just because he didn’t have help. He was still selfish even when he had help. Kobe has evolved from that, and he actually relies on his team mates. There were times where he had to score a lot to win. Also, Kobe having help is definitely not a detriment to his ability as a player just because he had help, and Iverson didn’t. So what if Kobe had Shaq. You think Shaq would have won so many rings without Kobe? I certianly don’t remember Shaq winning any until he got to LA. And no one actually thinks that Iverson’s attitude would have not butted heads with Shaq’s IF they played together?

    0
  • #412485
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    I’d still take Kobe first. Based on how Iverson’s career went down the drain like how it has in the past couple of years, it is hard not to go with Kobe. In comparison to what Kobe had to do alone, Iverson’s competition was pretty weak in the eastern conference when he made that run. Kobe had to compete with the Spurs, Mavericks, and Suns with pretty good player(emphasize the S) who were at the peak of their careers. Those teams were complete teams back when Kobe was alone in LA. It is just hard not to go with the guy with the more complete career and more complete player. A.I.’s mentality is just the fact that he is a selfish player, and not just because he didn’t have help. He was still selfish even when he had help. Kobe has evolved from that, and he actually relies on his team mates. There were times where he had to score a lot to win. Also, Kobe having help is definitely not a detriment to his ability as a player just because he had help, and Iverson didn’t. So what if Kobe had Shaq. You think Shaq would have won so many rings without Kobe? I certianly don’t remember Shaq winning any until he got to LA. And no one actually thinks that Iverson’s attitude would have not butted heads with Shaq’s IF they played together?

    0
  • #412482
    AvatarAvatar
    apb540
    Participant

     "Iverson killed Kobe everytime they went h2h. If Iverson had Shaq and Kobe had Iverson’s team I think Kobe would have 0 rings whilr Iverson would have 5 or so too."

    Nuff said

    0
  • #412499
    AvatarAvatar
    apb540
    Participant

     "Iverson killed Kobe everytime they went h2h. If Iverson had Shaq and Kobe had Iverson’s team I think Kobe would have 0 rings whilr Iverson would have 5 or so too."

    Nuff said

    0
  • #412510
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    What does head to head have anything to do with being the better player? That is like saying Paul Pierce is better than Kobe because he outplayed him in the 2007 finals. I fail to see the line of argument in that logic. Saying IF Iverson had Shaq only proves what? It only proves that Iverson, at best, was Kobe’s equal when he was along with Shaq. Kobe wasn’t even in his prime yet when he was playing with Shaq. Moreover, don’t you think saying Iverson would have won 5 or so is exaggerating way too much? That is a ridiculous statement. That statement is basically saying that Kobe would have been a different player if he didn’t play with the Lakers which I find it hard to believe. Kobe still would have been the more complete player than Iverson even if they did swap teams. The main reason why Shaq and Kobe won those championships is mainly because of the role players on their team anyway. There is not telling how a team would be with Iverson on it. Very hard to sit up and say that if they swapped teams, X, would have happened. People are underrating everything Kobe provided for those teams outside of just scoring.

    How much Iverson could have done with the team Kobe was on "alone"? See how easy questions like that can be turned around?

    0
  • #412527
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    What does head to head have anything to do with being the better player? That is like saying Paul Pierce is better than Kobe because he outplayed him in the 2007 finals. I fail to see the line of argument in that logic. Saying IF Iverson had Shaq only proves what? It only proves that Iverson, at best, was Kobe’s equal when he was along with Shaq. Kobe wasn’t even in his prime yet when he was playing with Shaq. Moreover, don’t you think saying Iverson would have won 5 or so is exaggerating way too much? That is a ridiculous statement. That statement is basically saying that Kobe would have been a different player if he didn’t play with the Lakers which I find it hard to believe. Kobe still would have been the more complete player than Iverson even if they did swap teams. The main reason why Shaq and Kobe won those championships is mainly because of the role players on their team anyway. There is not telling how a team would be with Iverson on it. Very hard to sit up and say that if they swapped teams, X, would have happened. People are underrating everything Kobe provided for those teams outside of just scoring.

    How much Iverson could have done with the team Kobe was on "alone"? See how easy questions like that can be turned around?

    0
  • #412530
    AvatarAvatar
    bkb77
    Participant

    Kobe is the better all-around player,but the talent that Kobe played with is uncomparable to the talent or lack there of that A.I played with. E.Snow & Aaron McKie dont compare to Shaq,Pau,L.O,or even Horry & D.Fish. A.I did the most with the least,Iknow he played with Melo for 2 or 3 years but AI wasnt the same AI at that time he lost a step & his body started to catch up to him & that was the begging of the end for him, but in his prime AI was the most exciting & the most popular player in the league. 

    0
  • #412547
    AvatarAvatar
    bkb77
    Participant

    Kobe is the better all-around player,but the talent that Kobe played with is uncomparable to the talent or lack there of that A.I played with. E.Snow & Aaron McKie dont compare to Shaq,Pau,L.O,or even Horry & D.Fish. A.I did the most with the least,Iknow he played with Melo for 2 or 3 years but AI wasnt the same AI at that time he lost a step & his body started to catch up to him & that was the begging of the end for him, but in his prime AI was the most exciting & the most popular player in the league. 

    0
  • #412584
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    why do people keep making a big deal about who they played with? If the only argument for kobe was rings, then sure bring up the talent they had around them. But pretty much everyone backing kobe on this are not simply using the ring argument. We are saying kobe was just flat out better. Iverson would have been a second option too along shaq. And iversons supporting cast was probably never as bad as what kobe had those 2 years after shaq left.

    0
  • #412601
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    why do people keep making a big deal about who they played with? If the only argument for kobe was rings, then sure bring up the talent they had around them. But pretty much everyone backing kobe on this are not simply using the ring argument. We are saying kobe was just flat out better. Iverson would have been a second option too along shaq. And iversons supporting cast was probably never as bad as what kobe had those 2 years after shaq left.

    0
  • #412739
    AvatarAvatar
    mbd
    Participant

    Supporting Cast was about even they both had terrible teams the difference is Iverson carried his terrible team to the finals. Kobe didnt do that. Iverson is 5’11 Kobe is 6’6,Kobe never took the beating Iverson had to take, iverson had nobody his whole career until the latter stages.

    0
  • #412754
    AvatarAvatar
    mbd
    Participant

    Supporting Cast was about even they both had terrible teams the difference is Iverson carried his terrible team to the finals. Kobe didnt do that. Iverson is 5’11 Kobe is 6’6,Kobe never took the beating Iverson had to take, iverson had nobody his whole career until the latter stages.

    0
  • #412779
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr. 19134
    Participant

    Iveron also averaged more minutes played per game then anybody in league history.  

    For his career including the last few years where his played time dropped Iverson averaged 41 MPG.

    Iverson Average over 40 minutes a game over 13 times in his career. Including 9 straight where he averaged over 42 minutes per game.  Can you comprehend how insane that it.  Of course his 5’11 160 pound frame caught up to him playing the way he played.  

    His MPG are a huge reason why he aged so fast.  

    0
  • #412794
    AvatarAvatar
    Mr. 19134
    Participant

    Iveron also averaged more minutes played per game then anybody in league history.  

    For his career including the last few years where his played time dropped Iverson averaged 41 MPG.

    Iverson Average over 40 minutes a game over 13 times in his career. Including 9 straight where he averaged over 42 minutes per game.  Can you comprehend how insane that it.  Of course his 5’11 160 pound frame caught up to him playing the way he played.  

    His MPG are a huge reason why he aged so fast.  

    0
  • #412787
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    @mbd, kobe only had 3 years of having a bad team. Iverson had many, so making one deep run doesnt caompare becasue we have no idea if kobe could have made a deep run. They were one game away from knocking off the suns in round one and who knows what could have happened that year. And no, the year iverson made his run, his roster was actually quite solid. Lots of great defensive minded role players. And look how NO solid number 2 option ever excelled with him. Stackhouse, coleman, glenn robinson, kukoc,  none of them could mash with iverson. Whats to say iverson could have meshed with other great players when he was a ball dominant volume shooter who never did mesh with anyone other then guys who would defend and give him the ball and get out of his way? 

    0
  • #412802
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    @mbd, kobe only had 3 years of having a bad team. Iverson had many, so making one deep run doesnt caompare becasue we have no idea if kobe could have made a deep run. They were one game away from knocking off the suns in round one and who knows what could have happened that year. And no, the year iverson made his run, his roster was actually quite solid. Lots of great defensive minded role players. And look how NO solid number 2 option ever excelled with him. Stackhouse, coleman, glenn robinson, kukoc,  none of them could mash with iverson. Whats to say iverson could have meshed with other great players when he was a ball dominant volume shooter who never did mesh with anyone other then guys who would defend and give him the ball and get out of his way? 

    0
  • #412799
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    Yeah, I don’t understand either what is the point in bringing up who they played with. You can measure how good they are by looking at them individually. Clearly, we’ve seen the best of what Iverson had to offer because he ball hogged his career. Who’s to say Kobe couldn’t have averaged some ridiculous numbers without sharing the main scoring behind Shaq, and he was already scoring ridiculous amounts with Shaq. Kobe has just more to over than what Iverson brung. I can’t believe we’re comparing Iverson to Kobe and there is actually debate about it.. There shouldn’t even be a debate.

    0
  • #412814
    AvatarAvatar
    Steroid
    Participant

    Yeah, I don’t understand either what is the point in bringing up who they played with. You can measure how good they are by looking at them individually. Clearly, we’ve seen the best of what Iverson had to offer because he ball hogged his career. Who’s to say Kobe couldn’t have averaged some ridiculous numbers without sharing the main scoring behind Shaq, and he was already scoring ridiculous amounts with Shaq. Kobe has just more to over than what Iverson brung. I can’t believe we’re comparing Iverson to Kobe and there is actually debate about it.. There shouldn’t even be a debate.

    0
  • #412834
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i hear you steroid. I mean even the people who say iverson was a better scorer, lets look at facts: total points scored(kobe), highest ppg in a season(kobe), most 40 point games(kobe) most 50 point game(kobe) most 60 point games(kobe) most points ever scored in a game(kobe) best fg/ft/3pt% (kobe, kobe, kobe).

    Even the assists, iverson only averaged 1.5 more for their careers. And defense is kobe in a landslide. I keep hearing how kobe had better teammates, forget teammates. Take teams, wins, rings out of the discussion.

    Also, look at longevity. Iverson hasnt been a factor for a year or two and kobe is still playing at an all-nba level and argubly the best player in the game. I would love to hear the answers from actual GM’s who do this for a living who they would take if they could do it over again.

    0
  • #412847
    AvatarAvatar
    llperez

    i hear you steroid. I mean even the people who say iverson was a better scorer, lets look at facts: total points scored(kobe), highest ppg in a season(kobe), most 40 point games(kobe) most 50 point game(kobe) most 60 point games(kobe) most points ever scored in a game(kobe) best fg/ft/3pt% (kobe, kobe, kobe).

    Even the assists, iverson only averaged 1.5 more for their careers. And defense is kobe in a landslide. I keep hearing how kobe had better teammates, forget teammates. Take teams, wins, rings out of the discussion.

    Also, look at longevity. Iverson hasnt been a factor for a year or two and kobe is still playing at an all-nba level and argubly the best player in the game. I would love to hear the answers from actual GM’s who do this for a living who they would take if they could do it over again.

    0
  • #412929
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    True, it was never great, he never really had the horses to surround himself with that Kobe had in Shaq and later on in Pau/Company. But, look at Kobe and Shaq’s three title teams. Go ahead, look at that roster up and down. Not the strongest roster, was it. They had Glen Rice for that first one, who by than was on the downside of his career, and some nice role guys, but, yeah, it was not a great team. Shaq and Kobe carried those teams, and to me that is pretty impressive. They were a duo that were probably as heavily relied upon as any in history that both of them produce for them to win. You may say that their were better duo’s, but to me, as far as duo’s being damn near equals, I rank them as the best. I read someone say that everyone is saying Iverson would have done the same thing on the Lakers, and at best that would make him Kobe’s equal. I totally agree with that, and probably like that person, I do not think the Lakers would have been as good with Iverson in for Kobe. It is true, we do not know what Kobe would be without Shaq those first few years, but to say he would not have been close to the same player he has become just does not seem to make sense. The team you end up on does have a great deal of what a player may become, but I think both of these players would have been successful regardless of which team they were chosen too. They were both that good really, they were going to succeed regardless of squad. To the people that say Kobe did not carry a team the way Iverson did, that may be fair enough, but I personally do not agree with that statement. How could you expect those Lakers teams to compete once Shaq left? They lost every starter from the year before and Kobe had the worst supporting cast of his career. The very next year, Kobe averages 35.4 ppg, takes his team to the play-offs and nearly gets by the Suns. I think it is safe to say that in the 3 obvious rebuilding years after Shaq was traded, Kobe was playing with players that resembled the supporting casts Iverson had in his first few years in the league.

    But, for those that point to Shaq as the one thing that became Kobe’s saving grace, and than also point to Gasol for Kobe’s resurgence, just know that Iverson was not as helpless as everyone thinks. He never had a great second option in his prime, but he had some very solid teammates that never seemed to fit with him. He had Toni Kukoc, Chris Webber, Keith Van Horn, all versions of Lamar Odom in a way. His best team, the 56-26 team that went to the finals the year Iverson won MVP, that team was full of incredible defenders. Eric Snow even said that everyone wrote off that team as being carried by Iverson, but that team had to sacrifice quite a lot to go by Iverson’s standards of Bubba Chucking up 25 shots per game. They had Aaron McKie, Dikembe Mutombo, George Lynch, Raja Bell, Eric Snow, Tyrone Hill and Jumaine Jones, all great defensive players. They also had the privilege of playing in an Eastern Conference that was incredibly inferior to the Western Conference that Kobe was playing in at the time. With all of that, Iverson made it out of the first round 3 times, and to the Finals once. For a team leader, that is still impressive, but what is to say that Kobe could not have done close to the same if not better? What is to say that Kobe would not have made life a little easier for those guys and play defense up to their level of intensity? Would Kobe not have shot the ball a little better from the field, spread the floor and maybe have Chris Webber getting a couple more buckets per game? The thing is guys, that Kobe in his prime was every bit the scorer and player Allen Iverson was, and AI never had the season that Kobe had in 2005-06. You can always pick on Kobe for not having suffered the struggle of Iverson never having that player to help him guide his team through the promised land, but I think that Kobe has shown all the proof he needs that he is one of the best to have ever played the game and a winner. Why has no one commented on the work ethic between the two players? If Iverson had been on the Lakers, would he have just improved his work ethic? Would Phil have gotten the best out of him? He probably would have been somewhere in the school of Larry Brown. It just kind of boggles my mind that people would think that after everything Kobe has done, that the 76ers would still have gone with Iverson just because he did not play with Shaq or Pau Gasol. Would you not have at least been interested to see where Kobe could have taken you? Please, break down their games and teams and tell me how Allen Iverson is a better player than Kobe Bryant, because, I do not see it in the least.

    0
  • #412940
    AvatarAvatar
    mikeyvthedon
    Participant

    True, it was never great, he never really had the horses to surround himself with that Kobe had in Shaq and later on in Pau/Company. But, look at Kobe and Shaq’s three title teams. Go ahead, look at that roster up and down. Not the strongest roster, was it. They had Glen Rice for that first one, who by than was on the downside of his career, and some nice role guys, but, yeah, it was not a great team. Shaq and Kobe carried those teams, and to me that is pretty impressive. They were a duo that were probably as heavily relied upon as any in history that both of them produce for them to win. You may say that their were better duo’s, but to me, as far as duo’s being damn near equals, I rank them as the best. I read someone say that everyone is saying Iverson would have done the same thing on the Lakers, and at best that would make him Kobe’s equal. I totally agree with that, and probably like that person, I do not think the Lakers would have been as good with Iverson in for Kobe. It is true, we do not know what Kobe would be without Shaq those first few years, but to say he would not have been close to the same player he has become just does not seem to make sense. The team you end up on does have a great deal of what a player may become, but I think both of these players would have been successful regardless of which team they were chosen too. They were both that good really, they were going to succeed regardless of squad. To the people that say Kobe did not carry a team the way Iverson did, that may be fair enough, but I personally do not agree with that statement. How could you expect those Lakers teams to compete once Shaq left? They lost every starter from the year before and Kobe had the worst supporting cast of his career. The very next year, Kobe averages 35.4 ppg, takes his team to the play-offs and nearly gets by the Suns. I think it is safe to say that in the 3 obvious rebuilding years after Shaq was traded, Kobe was playing with players that resembled the supporting casts Iverson had in his first few years in the league.

    But, for those that point to Shaq as the one thing that became Kobe’s saving grace, and than also point to Gasol for Kobe’s resurgence, just know that Iverson was not as helpless as everyone thinks. He never had a great second option in his prime, but he had some very solid teammates that never seemed to fit with him. He had Toni Kukoc, Chris Webber, Keith Van Horn, all versions of Lamar Odom in a way. His best team, the 56-26 team that went to the finals the year Iverson won MVP, that team was full of incredible defenders. Eric Snow even said that everyone wrote off that team as being carried by Iverson, but that team had to sacrifice quite a lot to go by Iverson’s standards of Bubba Chucking up 25 shots per game. They had Aaron McKie, Dikembe Mutombo, George Lynch, Raja Bell, Eric Snow, Tyrone Hill and Jumaine Jones, all great defensive players. They also had the privilege of playing in an Eastern Conference that was incredibly inferior to the Western Conference that Kobe was playing in at the time. With all of that, Iverson made it out of the first round 3 times, and to the Finals once. For a team leader, that is still impressive, but what is to say that Kobe could not have done close to the same if not better? What is to say that Kobe would not have made life a little easier for those guys and play defense up to their level of intensity? Would Kobe not have shot the ball a little better from the field, spread the floor and maybe have Chris Webber getting a couple more buckets per game? The thing is guys, that Kobe in his prime was every bit the scorer and player Allen Iverson was, and AI never had the season that Kobe had in 2005-06. You can always pick on Kobe for not having suffered the struggle of Iverson never having that player to help him guide his team through the promised land, but I think that Kobe has shown all the proof he needs that he is one of the best to have ever played the game and a winner. Why has no one commented on the work ethic between the two players? If Iverson had been on the Lakers, would he have just improved his work ethic? Would Phil have gotten the best out of him? He probably would have been somewhere in the school of Larry Brown. It just kind of boggles my mind that people would think that after everything Kobe has done, that the 76ers would still have gone with Iverson just because he did not play with Shaq or Pau Gasol. Would you not have at least been interested to see where Kobe could have taken you? Please, break down their games and teams and tell me how Allen Iverson is a better player than Kobe Bryant, because, I do not see it in the least.

    0
  • #412935
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     You guys are also failing to mention when the Bulls dynasty disbanded the East was extremely weak.  You can compare the rosters of the 76ers and Lakers and compare supporting casts, but it took 6 years after the Bulls disbanded for another East team to win a title.  I think Kobe could have taken a a sub par team to the finals in the early 2000’s like Iverson while playing in the east.  There were 7 teams in the East in 2000-2001 that had a sub .500 record and 5 of those won 30 or fewer games.  You stick Kobe on that same 2000-2001 76ers team I think they’d win 56 games and after seeing clutch Kobe playoff performances I don’t doubt that he could get past the Pacers, Raptors and Bucks to make it to the finals.  I’m not discrediting what Iverson did in that playoff run, but they were the best team in the East.  They may not have been good on paper, but they won 56 games, it’s not like he willed a 7 seed like a lot of people act like he did.  The best team in the East that year made it to the NBA finals.  I think Kobe in the same situation would have taken that team to the Finals as well.

    0
  • #412946
    AvatarAvatar
    JoeWolf1

     You guys are also failing to mention when the Bulls dynasty disbanded the East was extremely weak.  You can compare the rosters of the 76ers and Lakers and compare supporting casts, but it took 6 years after the Bulls disbanded for another East team to win a title.  I think Kobe could have taken a a sub par team to the finals in the early 2000’s like Iverson while playing in the east.  There were 7 teams in the East in 2000-2001 that had a sub .500 record and 5 of those won 30 or fewer games.  You stick Kobe on that same 2000-2001 76ers team I think they’d win 56 games and after seeing clutch Kobe playoff performances I don’t doubt that he could get past the Pacers, Raptors and Bucks to make it to the finals.  I’m not discrediting what Iverson did in that playoff run, but they were the best team in the East.  They may not have been good on paper, but they won 56 games, it’s not like he willed a 7 seed like a lot of people act like he did.  The best team in the East that year made it to the NBA finals.  I think Kobe in the same situation would have taken that team to the Finals as well.

    0
  • #412945
    AvatarAvatar
    M-DYMES
    Participant

    If the Sixers knew how good Kobe and AI were going to be, I think they’d go with Kobe.  Iverson had much less size and Kobe was a hometown product.  

    0
  • #412956
    AvatarAvatar
    M-DYMES
    Participant

    If the Sixers knew how good Kobe and AI were going to be, I think they’d go with Kobe.  Iverson had much less size and Kobe was a hometown product.  

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login