This topic contains 14 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar aamir543 12 years, 4 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #34068
    AvatarAvatar
    rickybobby
    Participant

    http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7ymofzp

    Lineups

    Alanta: Teague,Johnson,Williams,Horford,Kaman,6th man Moe Williams

    Chicago: Rose,Brewer,Granger,Boozer,Noah

    Clippers: Hinrich,Gordon,Deng,Griffin,Jordan

    Pacers:Collinson,Jones,George,Smith,Hibbert

    Bulls get their Second scorer behind rose, Clippers get their small forward to compliment Griffin and Gordon and a solid pg that can run the team in Hinrich and allowing Jordan to become their Center of the future. Alanta gets bigger up Front allowing Horford to play his natural pf postion and adding a scoring threat in moe williams since crawford more than likely going to leave. Pacers get a huge upgrade at pf an allowing George to take over the sf spot.

    0
  • #610494
    AvatarAvatar
    RUDEBOY_
    Participant

    I Love these Armchair GM’s and so does DYNCE…..lol

    0
  • #610496
    AvatarAvatar
    Charlie Sheen
    Participant

    thats solid actually I doubt it happens since Indiana wont send their best player to a division rival but nonetheless its a win-win-win-win 

    0
  • #610498
    AvatarAvatar
    The Scare Crow Returns
    Participant

    It could work in theory but it’s hard to see 1 trade happen this season, let alone a 4 team trade…

    I still think The Pacers would need a Kevin Martin at Sg after this..

    0
  • #610501
    AvatarAvatar
    SwatLakeCity
    Participant

    The question is: Is Paul George ready to assume the load of being the next Danny Granger? Filling those shoes will be a big responsibility, one that George will not be able to fill alone. Josh Smith can certainly help in shouldering the load but is it enough? I think that Paul George is better coming off the bench as a sixth man. I don’t believe he is ready to start.

    0
  • #610503
    AvatarAvatar
    thparadox
    Participant

     

    Why would the hawks do that?

    0
  • #610509
    AvatarAvatar
    bdiddy5115
    Participant

    Not bad.

    The Hawks would consider it, largely because they just need a roster shakeup. J.Smith is an undersized 4 and Horford is playing at 5 when his natural spot is at the 4. I  think they’d need to acquire one more asset or so to make this deal more equal.

    0
  • #610511
    AvatarAvatar
    torontoraptors10
    Participant

    The Hawks would it because it allows Horford to play PF and they have a legit centre in Chris Kaman. They also get a PG that can teach Jeff Teague.

    And oh yeah, Kaman’s contract is expiring.

    0
  • #610516
    AvatarAvatar
    gopack10
    Participant

    This trade is horrible.  Why would we give up our biggest trade asset for a one year rental in Kaman and a backup PG?  We add an additional $8 million in salary and get a lot older and less athletic.

    I’d rather have Hinrich backup up Teague personally.  This sounds like a pipe dream trade from a Chicago fan.

    0
  • #610518
    AvatarAvatar
    Pyron
    Participant

     that’s the point of the trade machine lol… to have fun making up ridiculous trades 🙂

     

    there’s always fun in thinking "what if…."

    0
  • #610519
    AvatarAvatar
    rickybobby
    Participant

     I’m a Houston Rockets fan, but i thought this trade would help all teams, and plus the hawks need  to do something becausee they have been stuck in quicksand for the last couple of years and are not moving anywhere. Also was reported last year that Josh smith wanted out. and Chris Kaman expiring contract givings them some flexibility and moe williams adds a much needed scoring threats expecially since crawford is on the way out.

    0
  • #610542
    AvatarAvatar
    kngojc
    Participant

     What if the Bulls added to that trade sending their first round pick from Charlotte to Atl because the Bulls are giving up the least, even though Deng is a great player he isn’t that great overall on a championship team, while the Hawks are giving up the most. This evens things out a little bit more IMO and someone could throw in another player to the Bulls to sweeten the deal for them a bit more.

    Another idea would be based off that original trade but in addition, send Kyle Korver to the Pacers for an added shooter and in return the Bulls get Randy Foye from the Clippers. It solves the huge hole (at least temporarily) at SG. Convincing the Clippers to get rid of Kaman and Williams would be tough but I think Deng could be the perfect mentor for Aminu to turn him into their SF of the future and Hinrich is a decent place holder for the Wolves draft pick they’ll be getting where even if its not in the top 3 like Scare Crow is so convinced it won’t be, their will still be a good PG to draft that can compete with Bledsoe. 

    0
  • #610592
    AvatarAvatar
    ProudGrandpa
    Participant

    yall better stop hatin on Danny Granger or he gon go super "Pizza Rolls" ham on yall other teams.

    0
  • #610606
    AvatarAvatar
    IndianaBasketball
    Participant

    Granger would give Chicago another scorer, but he’s not really somebody that’s going to create off of the dribble. He’s an upgrade from Luol Deng offensively, but minus the defense… UNLESS due to not having to carry such a big offensive load, he goes back to his old defensive ways.

    As a Pacers fan, this makes them a worse team though. No go-to scorer. George isn’t ready.

    0
  • #610610
    AvatarAvatar
    aamir543
    Participant

    If the Hawks amnesty Johnson, then they would have some cap after Kaman’s contract expires. But I doubt Atlanta would get any Free Agents, and so in that case, I don’t like that trade at all. They would need a pick or two and a prospect that may or may not develop.

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login