I just read Aaron's assement of Daye at the combine on day 1 and it wasn't very positive going as far as to say he didn't shoot it well. Then over at NBA.com there is an article saying Daye stole the show among small forwards and his shot barely touched the net when it went in and how he looked smooth in everything he did. http://www.nba.com/2009/news/05/28/combine.dayone/ my thing is how can two people watch the same player on the same day and have two such differing opinions.
I already noticed that too, this happens when the judgment is biased. (i dont know which judgment)
Also, thruth can be known, because shooting percent is not an intangible, somebody must have counted the balls he threw in and out.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/draft2009/columns/story?columnist=ford_cha... So NBA.com (draft express) and espn (chad ford) said Daye was the man on day one of the combine. Yet nbadraft.net said he disappointed. I ask again how can this be?
Sounds like Aaron is player hating to me
something is out of place
Ill be the 1st one o say..I believe in Daye. But people i know there in CHicago are saying he maybe goin back to Gonzaga because he is not ready
also read MOCK DRAFT 4.0