LAL BKN SAC Trade - NBADraft.net

This topic contains 10 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by gimpybasketball 9 years, 11 months ago.

Author
Posts
Posted on: Wed, 02/20/2013 - 7:11am #46688

projectpat310
Participant
Before you guys start clicking DISLIKE please read all the way through.
Lakers receive Brook Lopez and Tyreke Evans. They get an offensive center to replace Dwight and instant offense/playmaking guard off the bench in Evans. Ultimately Evans will take over for Nash.
Nets receive Dwight Howard and John Salmons. Nets get the guy they wanted all along in Dwight and the off the bench scorer in Salmons that they have been trying to obtain (went after Ben Gordon earlier in the year).
Kings receive Marshon Brooks, Tyshawn Taylor, and Kris Humphries. Most of you will say “why would the Kings do this??”. Well, they shed themselves of Salmons’ 3 year deal, get two young guards with potential, plus Kris Humphiees will be a $12million expiring contract next year aka TRADE ASSET. They also won’t be forced to overpay Tyreke, who is a free agent, and give the reigns completely to Isaiah Thomas who is their future PG anyway.
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine/?tradeId=apn87yh
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/20/2013 - 7:24am #749271

BasketBalAllan
Participant
The problem is that Salmons contract will expire next year, bc of a team option in his contract, just like Kris. So this would be like the Kings trading Rekes bird rights for Brooks and Taylor, something that should be more of a last resort trade for the Kings.
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/20/2013 - 7:57am #749283

HobbyOG
Participant
I’ve seen worst trades..so I can’t give you a negative. Problem is Tyreke is a UFA end of the season, do the Lakers really want to pay him? I don’t think he’s proven enough to carry the Laker tradition. The Kings would prob want some draft picks as well
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/20/2013 - 8:14am #749291

Lebron’s Hairline
Participant
Tyreke taking over for Nash? I’ll pass
0
Posted on: Wed, 02/20/2013 - 10:16am #749327

joshsm12
Participant
Im saying no from the nets standpoint, giving up lopez, brooks, humphries and taylor for basically dwight is ridiculous, nets were offering the magic far less than that when no one knew how lopez would heal, now that hes back stronger you think they will give up two starters and gwo pivotal young bench guys for dwight and a year rental of a lackluster bench player….. Stupid choice for them.
0
Posted on: Fri, 05/02/2014 - 7:45pm #896844

projectpat310
Participant
Funny how this trade looks decent for everyone in hindsight. So many haters on this site who click a NEG without thinking.
0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/03/2014 - 4:41am #897055
  
  gimpybasketball
  Participant
  Yeah, not sure what you think decent means but In hindsight
  
  The Lakers make out like bandits.
  
  The Kings cant get Rudy Gay without giving up someone else they currently have.
  
  The Nets get screwed out of Lopez when Dwight leaves for Houston.
  
  0
- Posted on: Sat, 05/03/2014 - 4:41am #896941
  
  gimpybasketball
  Participant
  Yeah, not sure what you think decent means but In hindsight
  
  The Lakers make out like bandits.
  
  The Kings cant get Rudy Gay without giving up someone else they currently have.
  
  The Nets get screwed out of Lopez when Dwight leaves for Houston.
  
  0
  - Posted on: Sat, 05/03/2014 - 4:47am #897057
    
    gimpybasketball
    Participant
    It also disrupts the Nets getting Pierce and KG.
    0
  - Posted on: Sat, 05/03/2014 - 4:47am #896942
    
    gimpybasketball
    Participant
    It also disrupts the Nets getting Pierce and KG.
    0
Posted on: Fri, 05/02/2014 - 7:45pm #896959

projectpat310
Participant
Funny how this trade looks decent for everyone in hindsight. So many haters on this site who click a NEG without thinking.
0
Author
Posts

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.