Mocking Ty Lawson to Chicago?? Really??
the bulls have hinrich and hunter coming off the bench. assuming they trade hinrich, they would need another pg to back up rose. but i don't think it's a smart move to draft another pg in the mid-1st round after drafting your franchise player the year before. i think they should put there blair or lawal. but then, they'd have to change the 26th.
Just as bad are the fools saying dont take a pg at 16...but take one at 26.
When your starting PG is DERRICK ROSE, you dont take a PG in the 1st rd. Period. Grab a vet to play those 8 minutes and call it a day.
And you made my point of why we dont need Kirk Hinrich....Rose is going to be playing pretty much all the minutes as his career goes on...why pay Hinrich all that money for nothing. If i had a choice of Patty Mills/Marcus Thornton/Jrue Holiday/Calathes/Teague or Taj Gibson....im taking a back up PG.
this whole mock suxx they got patty mills to the hornets and lawson to the bulls lol lawson has no shooting range at all, u can look around the nba and find 50 ty lawsons college is alot diff from the nba. Whoever made this mock knows nothing about the nba.
Their mocks do tend to suck until after the draft order. I think they do it because it gives them a way to show how stock is rising and falling even though we want to see who would a team actually draft. I was upset about this a while back but now I am just chilling and waiting I have a mock draft made that I feel is really good but i am not releasing it until after tuesday.
Any mock draft that takes into account team needs before June "suxx." This one gives you a relatively good idea of where players will go in the draft as of now. A lot of things can change between now and then, including team needs, so it's pointless to do much more than a glorified big board for now.










You have to be kidding me. This IS an NBADraft website, right? Why the heck would the bulls take a point guard...