share

Mocking Ty Lawson to Chicago?? Really??

shady00
shady00's picture
Registered User
Joined: 10/10/2008
Posts: 12
Points: 2
Offline
Mocking Ty Lawson to Chicago?? Really??

You have to be kidding me. This IS an NBADraft website, right? Why the heck would the bulls take a point guard...


usfballer
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 144
Points: 204
Offline
Thank you

That has been bugging me for awhile now. He's been in that spot for the last few weeks. I'm hoping they just aren't taking team needs into consideration.

ucantcheckmejdj3
Registered User
Joined: 03/29/2009
Posts: 88
Points: 16
Offline
They don't take into account

They don't take into account teem needs until AFTER the draft lottery on may 19th

ChiTowns Finest
ChiTowns Finest's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/11/2009
Posts: 8
Points: 2
Offline
not gonna happen mr. Lawson

well they need to fix that cause we all are pretty sure they are not going 2 use the number 16 pick on a point guard.....

rvirsal
rvirsal's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/08/2009
Posts: 213
Points: 11
Offline
that's funny

the bulls have hinrich and hunter coming off the bench. assuming they trade hinrich, they would need another pg to back up rose. but i don't think it's a smart move to draft another pg in the mid-1st round after drafting your franchise player the year before. i think they should put there blair or lawal. but then, they'd have to change the 26th.

Csharp3410
Registered User
Joined: 03/01/2009
Posts: 213
Points: 121
Offline
If they trade Hinrich they

If they trade Hinrich they better take a backup PG with the 26th pick not the 16 lol

s2jepeka
Registered User
Joined: 04/17/2009
Posts: 138
Points: 22
Offline
Just as bad are the fools

Just as bad are the fools saying dont take a pg at 16...but take one at 26.

When your starting PG is DERRICK ROSE, you dont take a PG in the 1st rd. Period. Grab a vet to play those 8 minutes and call it a day.

WritingNBA.blog...
WritingNBA.blogspot.com's picture
Registered User
Joined: 12/03/2008
Posts: 82
Points: 12
Offline
Bulls will either take

Bulls will either take Dejuan Blair, James Johnson, or BJ Mullens with the 16th pick. Assuming no one falls out the lottery like Clark.

Csharp3410
Registered User
Joined: 03/01/2009
Posts: 213
Points: 121
Offline
And you made my point of why

And you made my point of why we dont need Kirk Hinrich....Rose is going to be playing pretty much all the minutes as his career goes on...why pay Hinrich all that money for nothing. If i had a choice of Patty Mills/Marcus Thornton/Jrue Holiday/Calathes/Teague or Taj Gibson....im taking a back up PG.

2K_DAVIS
2K_DAVIS's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/13/2009
Posts: 80
Points: 12
Offline
wow

this whole mock suxx they got patty mills to the hornets and lawson to the bulls lol lawson has no shooting range at all, u can look around the nba and find 50 ty lawsons college is alot diff from the nba. Whoever made this mock knows nothing about the nba.

2K_DAVIS
2K_DAVIS's picture
Registered User
Joined: 05/13/2009
Posts: 80
Points: 12
Offline
yea

but either way this educated guess mock suxx

sheltwon3
sheltwon3's picture
Registered User
Joined: 03/30/2009
Posts: 6364
Points: 2607
Offline
Their mocks do tend to suck

Their mocks do tend to suck until after the draft order. I think they do it because it gives them a way to show how stock is rising and falling even though we want to see who would a team actually draft. I was upset about this a while back but now I am just chilling and waiting I have a mock draft made that I feel is really good but i am not releasing it until after tuesday.

ch15r36is
Registered User
Joined: 06/13/2008
Posts: 230
Points: 10
Offline
suxx

Any mock draft that takes into account team needs before June "suxx." This one gives you a relatively good idea of where players will go in the draft as of now. A lot of things can change between now and then, including team needs, so it's pointless to do much more than a glorified big board for now.

RSS: Syndicate content