This topic contains 20 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by AvatarAvatar Stanford hoops 14 years, 9 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #6092
    AvatarAvatar
    valentine

    where do you think a good fit for him would be?

    0
  • #175590
    AvatarAvatar
    adjose5
    Participant

    Bulls, Hornets, Mavericks, Toronto….I’d say the Nuggets if they lose Dahntay Jones

    0
  • #175593
    AvatarAvatar
    Ace Da Renegade
    Participant

    don’t reely have an opinion on dis but he seems like he would do best on a team with a run and gun type of team due to his athleticism

    0
  • #175595
    AvatarAvatar
    J-CHRISTOS
    Participant

    VON WAFER DOES HAS ELITE EXPLOSIVENESS,BUT HE NEED 1 MORE YEAR TO PROVE HIMSELF,IF I WERE A TEAM I WOULD GIVE HIM 1 OR 2 YEAR DEAL

    0
  • #175611
    AvatarAvatar
    RickyRubio9
    Participant

    will do their best to resign him. Any team that needs a shot in the arm off the bench should look at Wafer.

    0
  • #175613
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Dallas.

    0
  • #175620
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    the knicks or golden state

    0
  • #175621
    AvatarAvatar
    mercry
    Participant

    dallas!

    0
  • #175625
    AvatarAvatar
    RickyRubio9
    Participant

    DUDE, one word: Jet. The end.

    0
  • #175628
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    Jet comes off the bench….

    0
  • #175632
    AvatarAvatar
    RickyRubio9
    Participant

    Wafer to start? Crazy…He is basically a poor man’s Jet. Jet can start if needed, but Dallas has their strategy of bringing him off the bench. With them looking at Marion they could move Howard to the 2 and start him which would still bring Jet off the bench. I don’t think Wafer would be asked to start…that brings up his price.

    0
  • #175635
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    wafer as a starter??..hmmmm potenially possibly..right now hes best comming off the bench and sparking up the bench unit

    0
  • #175636
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    howard at the 2 isnt the best idea either..hes best served as a three slashing and getting boards..he has a harder time checking quick sgs…some players are built for a position josh is built for the 3

    0
  • #175637
    AvatarAvatar
    Knicksboy34
    Participant

    i disagree on the bringing up the price part. I think at a price like 4 years-8 mil…..

    also, Howard at the 2 seems to me like a bad idea.

    0
  • #175639
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    wafer doesnt have the power to bring up the price…..is there any real interest in him by other teams so far?

    0
  • #175648
    AvatarAvatar
    CavsDawg
    Participant

    Von Wafer can start on a few lottery teams.

    if he were smart, he’d focus on defense and try and get to be a back-up role player on a contender

    0
  • #175651
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    hes a if starter..whicvh is obvious to other teams including lotto teams or else they would be falling over them selves trying to sign him

    0
  • #175701
    AvatarAvatar
    Bosterito
    Participant

    Miami. Everyone says that they are looking for a back up scorer for Wade, theyre even looking at Iverson. I would have Von Wafer hes not asking for thta much money

    0
  • #175703
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    miami?..thats not a good pickup wafer isnt a upgrade over cook off the bench

    0
  • #175806
    AvatarAvatar
    bluedevils12
    Participant

    the twolves, thunder, or the grizzlies. all would be sixth man positions of course

    0
  • #175858
    AvatarAvatar
    Stanford hoops
    Participant

    thunder likes the kid they have out of washington state as the back up…i havent done much research about the grizz and twolves back up

    0

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Login