This topic contains 20 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Stanford hoops 14 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 7:36am #6092
valentinewhere do you think a good fit for him would be?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 7:43am #175590
adjose5ParticipantBulls, Hornets, Mavericks, Toronto….I’d say the Nuggets if they lose Dahntay Jones
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 7:48am #175593
Ace Da RenegadeParticipantdon’t reely have an opinion on dis but he seems like he would do best on a team with a run and gun type of team due to his athleticism
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 7:51am #175595
J-CHRISTOSParticipantVON WAFER DOES HAS ELITE EXPLOSIVENESS,BUT HE NEED 1 MORE YEAR TO PROVE HIMSELF,IF I WERE A TEAM I WOULD GIVE HIM 1 OR 2 YEAR DEAL
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:33am #175611
RickyRubio9Participantwill do their best to resign him. Any team that needs a shot in the arm off the bench should look at Wafer.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:36am #175613
Knicksboy34ParticipantDallas.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:41am #175620
Stanford hoopsParticipantthe knicks or golden state
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:41am #175621
mercryParticipantdallas!
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:46am #175625
RickyRubio9ParticipantDUDE, one word: Jet. The end.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:48am #175628
Knicksboy34ParticipantJet comes off the bench….
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:51am #175632
RickyRubio9ParticipantWafer to start? Crazy…He is basically a poor man’s Jet. Jet can start if needed, but Dallas has their strategy of bringing him off the bench. With them looking at Marion they could move Howard to the 2 and start him which would still bring Jet off the bench. I don’t think Wafer would be asked to start…that brings up his price.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:52am #175635
Stanford hoopsParticipantwafer as a starter??..hmmmm potenially possibly..right now hes best comming off the bench and sparking up the bench unit
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:53am #175636
Stanford hoopsParticipanthoward at the 2 isnt the best idea either..hes best served as a three slashing and getting boards..he has a harder time checking quick sgs…some players are built for a position josh is built for the 3
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:54am #175637
Knicksboy34Participanti disagree on the bringing up the price part. I think at a price like 4 years-8 mil…..
also, Howard at the 2 seems to me like a bad idea.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 8:57am #175639
Stanford hoopsParticipantwafer doesnt have the power to bring up the price…..is there any real interest in him by other teams so far?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 9:11am #175648
CavsDawgParticipantVon Wafer can start on a few lottery teams.
if he were smart, he’d focus on defense and try and get to be a back-up role player on a contender
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 9:14am #175651
Stanford hoopsParticipanthes a if starter..whicvh is obvious to other teams including lotto teams or else they would be falling over them selves trying to sign him
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 10:44am #175701
BosteritoParticipantMiami. Everyone says that they are looking for a back up scorer for Wade, theyre even looking at Iverson. I would have Von Wafer hes not asking for thta much money
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 10:45am #175703
Stanford hoopsParticipantmiami?..thats not a good pickup wafer isnt a upgrade over cook off the bench
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 1:06pm #175806
bluedevils12Participantthe twolves, thunder, or the grizzlies. all would be sixth man positions of course
0 - Posted on: Sat, 07/04/2009 - 2:30pm #175858
Stanford hoopsParticipantthunder likes the kid they have out of washington state as the back up…i havent done much research about the grizz and twolves back up
0 - AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |