This topic contains 9 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by
Forte IV 15 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
- Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 6:17am #24659
Lotto StudParticipantWhat if New York drafted Lance Stephenson over Andy Rautins and Landry Fields?
What would the pros and cons be to the situation of him playing in New York like Marbury?
Would he have had the chance to flourish, or would New York bury him on a deep bench like they tend to do majority of their acquisitions?
Knicks fans I would especially love to hear from you all.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 6:19am #472588

Anton123ParticipantThey are letting Fields start, so I don’t see why Stephenson would not get some minutes, but if they had drafted Fields and Stephenson, Landry would probably gobble up all his minutes anyway
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 6:19am #472603

Anton123ParticipantThey are letting Fields start, so I don’t see why Stephenson would not get some minutes, but if they had drafted Fields and Stephenson, Landry would probably gobble up all his minutes anyway
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 6:28am #472594

sammybuckeye13ParticipantIf Stephenson got into trouble while playing for Indiana I think there definitely would have been overwhelming odds against him in NY, even if it is his home. I think Fields is still the better fit though because he doesn’t need the ball in his hands to be effective, and it’s not like they need more scoring. At this point it looks like they definitely should’ve taken him over Rautins because Rautins isn’t even playing, so what would the downside have been?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 6:28am #472609

sammybuckeye13ParticipantIf Stephenson got into trouble while playing for Indiana I think there definitely would have been overwhelming odds against him in NY, even if it is his home. I think Fields is still the better fit though because he doesn’t need the ball in his hands to be effective, and it’s not like they need more scoring. At this point it looks like they definitely should’ve taken him over Rautins because Rautins isn’t even playing, so what would the downside have been?
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 7:10am #472616

Toronto16ParticipantThe Knicks were trying to change the culture of their team though, and not have any head cases, and they knew that even though Stephenson had the talent he was trouble prone.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 7:10am #472631

Toronto16ParticipantThe Knicks were trying to change the culture of their team though, and not have any head cases, and they knew that even though Stephenson had the talent he was trouble prone.
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 7:43am #472638

Malik-UniversalParticipantstephenson already got in trouble in indy…
if that happened in NY, he wouldve probably been cut
or severly crucified by the media lol
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 7:43am #472652

Malik-UniversalParticipantstephenson already got in trouble in indy…
if that happened in NY, he wouldve probably been cut
or severly crucified by the media lol
0 - Posted on: Sat, 01/08/2011 - 9:26am #472690

Forte IVParticipantNot gonna lie, when i saw the Knicks drafted Fields, i thought they were crazy because i thought he would go undrafted.
0 - AuthorPosts
| You must be logged in to reply to this topic. | Login |